Adebayo and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (2024-027220) [2025] ZAGPPHC 34 (20 January 2025)
The application for a mandamus fails because the applicant did not exhaust the internal remedies provided by the Immigration Act nor did he pursue a review application under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. The applicant did not demonstrate that no alternative legal remedy was available. The court cannot permit a review to be brought under the guise of a mandamus. Consequently, the requirements for a mandamus are not satisfied and the application must be dismissed.
- Citation
- [2025] ZAGPPHC 34
- Parties
- Applicant: Charles Oladipupo Adebayo; Applicant: Dorah Kedibone Vukela; Respondent: Minister of Home Affairs; Respondent: Director General Home Affairs
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2025
- Case Number
- 2024-027220
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Opposed Motion Court; Final Relief Sought
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; each party to bear its own costs.
- Judges
- E van der Schyff
- Legal Topics
- Mandamus, Internal Remedies, Immigration Act, Promotion of Administrative Justice Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Oladipupo Adebayo
Applicant
Dorah Kedibone Vukela
Applicant
Minister of Home Affairs
Respondent
Director General Home Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Opposed Motion Court; Final Relief Sought
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Department of Home Affairs unlawfully revoked the applicant's permanent residence permit and identity document.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a mandamus restoring his permanent residence permit and identity document.
- 3 Whether the applicant exhausted internal remedies or has no alternative legal remedy available.
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a mandamus fails because the applicant did not exhaust the internal remedies provided by the Immigration Act nor did he pursue a review application under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. The applicant did not demonstrate that no alternative legal remedy was available. The court cannot permit a review to be brought under the guise of a mandamus. Consequently, the requirements for a mandamus are not satisfied and the application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; each party to bear its own costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- Each party is to carry its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment