AFGRI Agri Services (Pty) Ltd and Another v Certain Assets and Businesses by Hinterland Holding (Pty) Ltd and its Subsidiaries and Another (LM083Aug20) [2020] ZACT 30 (20 October 2020)
The Tribunal found that the proposed demerger would not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition, as there was no horizontal overlap and only a minor vertical overlap that did not raise foreclosure concerns. The competitive landscape remained unchanged, with sufficient alternative suppliers and competitors. The Tribunal accepted the parties' undertaking that no retrenchments would occur and imposed a two-year moratorium on retrenchments to safeguard employment. The transaction did not reduce the shareholding of historically disadvantaged persons, as B-BBEE partners' interests were maintained or increased. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction was consistent...
- Citation
- [2020] ZACT 30
- Parties
- Applicant: AFGRI Agri Services (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Senwes Limited; Respondent: Certain Assets and Businesses by Hinterland Holding (Pty) Ltd and its Subsidiaries; Respondent: Hinterland Holdings Proprietary Limited
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2020
- Case Number
- LM083Aug20
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Application / Conditional Approval
- Outcome
- Merger conditionally approved subject to a two-year moratorium on retrenchments and compliance monitoring.
- Judges
- M Mazwai, E Daniels, A Roskam
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Public Interest Conditions, Employment Protection, Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AFGRI Agri Services (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Senwes Limited
Applicant
Certain Assets and Businesses by Hinterland Holding (Pty) Ltd and its Subsidiaries
Respondent
Hinterland Holdings Proprietary Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Application / Conditional Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed demerger between AFGRI and Senwes will substantially prevent or lessen competition in the relevant markets.
- 2 Whether the transaction will have adverse effects on employment and public interest, including the position of historically disadvantaged persons.
- 3 Whether the conditions imposed adequately address concerns raised by unions regarding retrenchments and bargaining council participation.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed demerger would not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition, as there was no horizontal overlap and only a minor vertical overlap that did not raise foreclosure concerns. The competitive landscape remained unchanged, with sufficient alternative suppliers and competitors. The Tribunal accepted the parties' undertaking that no retrenchments would occur and imposed a two-year moratorium on retrenchments to safeguard employment. The transaction did not reduce the shareholding of historically disadvantaged persons, as B-BBEE partners' interests were maintained or increased. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction was consistent...
Court Disposition
Merger conditionally approved subject to a two-year moratorium on retrenchments and compliance monitoring.
Orders
- The merger is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A.
- The merging parties shall not retrench any employees for a period of two years from the approval date, except as specified in the conditions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment