Afriforum NPC and Others v Van Der Walt and Others (54318/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 203 (12 March 2024)
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed on the basis that the sixth and seventh applicants lack locus standi, as they are not acting on behalf of the Trust and are not beneficiaries. This procedural defect is dispositive of the application. The court also addressed the grounds of appeal, finding that the applicants' challenge to the findings regarding their conduct and the timing of trustee powers was not supported by the facts. The declaratory relief and costs order granted in the main judgment remain unaffected.
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPPHC 203
- Parties
- Applicant: Afriforum NPC; Applicant: Solidarity Trade Union; Applicant: Joyce Kathryn Jansen Van Rensburg; Applicant: Ijay Van Der Walt; Applicant: Babsie Sharon Kruger; Applicant: Ignatius Johannes Du Preez N.O.; Applicant: Marius Wynand Schoeman N.O.; Respondent: Frederick Johannes Van Der Walt; Respondent: Ignatius Johannes Van Der Walt; Respondent: Engela Carolina Nel; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Pretoria; Respondent: Willem Francois Bouwer; Respondent: Willem Andries Filmalter
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2024
- Case Number
- 54318/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Declaratory and Costs Orders
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs against the sixth and seventh applicants in their personal capacity.
- Judges
- S Potterill
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Removal, Locus Standi, Declaratory Relief, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Afriforum NPC
Applicant
Solidarity Trade Union
Applicant
Joyce Kathryn Jansen Van Rensburg
Applicant
Ijay Van Der Walt
Applicant
Babsie Sharon Kruger
Applicant
Ignatius Johannes Du Preez N.O.
Applicant
Marius Wynand Schoeman N.O.
Applicant
Frederick Johannes Van Der Walt
Respondent
Ignatius Johannes Van Der Walt
Respondent
Engela Carolina Nel
Respondent
The Master of the High Court, Pretoria
Respondent
Willem Francois Bouwer
Respondent
Willem Andries Filmalter
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Declaratory and Costs Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sixth and seventh applicants have locus standi to seek leave to appeal as co-trustees not acting on behalf of the Trust.
- 2 Whether the declaratory relief and costs order granted in the main judgment should be subject to appeal.
- 3 Whether the removal of the first respondent as trustee was in the best interests of the Trust.
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed on the basis that the sixth and seventh applicants lack locus standi, as they are not acting on behalf of the Trust and are not beneficiaries. This procedural defect is dispositive of the application. The court also addressed the grounds of appeal, finding that the applicants' challenge to the findings regarding their conduct and the timing of trustee powers was not supported by the facts. The declaratory relief and costs order granted in the main judgment remain unaffected.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs against the sixth and seventh applicants in their personal capacity.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- The sixth and seventh applicants are to carry the costs in their personal capacity as they are not acting on behalf of the Trust.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment