Afrisake NPC and Others v The City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality and Others (74192/2003) [2016] ZAGPPHC 641 (22 July 2016)
The court found that the applicants had established a prima facie right to the relief sought, as the payment of R950 million to TUMS was directly linked to the validity of the Master Services Agreement (MSA), which was under review for alleged constitutional invalidity and non-compliance with procurement legislation. The urgency was justified given the imminent payment and the public interest involved. The court held that irreparable harm would result if the interdict was refused, as the funds could be dissipated before the review was finalised. The balance of convenience favoured the applicants, as TUMS had agreed to continue providing services pending the outcome. The respondents'...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPPHC 641
- Parties
- Applicant: Afrisake NPC; Applicant: Afriforum NPC; Applicant: Cornelius Jansen van Rensburg; Respondent: The City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: PEU Capital Partners (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Total Utility Management Services (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2016
- Case Number
- 74192/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Extension of Interim Interdict Pending Review
- Outcome
- Interim interdict extended as prayed, pending finalisation of the review application.
- Judges
- BAM
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Review of Administrative Action, Competitive Bidding, Municipal Procurement, Constitutional Invalidity, Public Interest Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Afrisake NPC
Applicant
Afriforum NPC
Applicant
Cornelius Jansen van Rensburg
Applicant
The City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
PEU Capital Partners (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Total Utility Management Services (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Extension of Interim Interdict Pending Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have established a prima facie right to an interim interdict preventing payment of R950 million pending review of the Master Services Agreement.
- 2 Whether the payment of R950 million to TUMS is intrinsically linked to the validity of the Master Services Agreement.
- 3 Whether the applicants will suffer irreparable harm if the interdict is refused.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had established a prima facie right to the relief sought, as the payment of R950 million to TUMS was directly linked to the validity of the Master Services Agreement (MSA), which was under review for alleged constitutional invalidity and non-compliance with procurement legislation. The urgency was justified given the imminent payment and the public interest involved. The court held that irreparable harm would result if the interdict was refused, as the funds could be dissipated before the review was finalised. The balance of convenience favoured the applicants, as TUMS had agreed to continue providing services pending the outcome. The respondents'...
Court Disposition
Interim interdict extended as prayed, pending finalisation of the review application.
Orders
- The interim interdict restraining the City of Tshwane from paying R950 million to Total Utility Management Services (Pty) Ltd is extended as prayed in prayers 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Notice of Motion.
- Applicants to approach the Deputy Judge President for a preferential date for the hearing of the pending review application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment