Afrovan (Pty) Ltd v Wellsted (Pty) Ltd (215/82) [1984] ZASCA 25 (26 March 1984)

Afrovan (Pty) Ltd v Wellsted (Pty) Ltd (215/82) [1984] ZASCA 25 (26 March 1984)

The board of Afrovan was entitled to act on the information provided by Wellsted's representative, which acknowledged a change in the ownership of Wellsted's major domestic shareholding. The application to retain the Afrovan franchise was itself an admission that such a change had occurred, triggering the board's powers under article 36 bis (b). The board's decision was reasonable and in line with the purpose of the Articles, which aim to maintain high standards among consortium members. The procedure followed at the meeting was fair; Wellsted's representative was given an opportunity to address the board, and his absence during deliberations was by agreement. There was no evidence that...

Citation
[1984] ZASCA 25
Parties
Appellant: Afrovan (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Jack Wellsted (Pty) Ltd
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 March 1984
Case Number
215/82
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Full Court of Cape Provincial Division
Outcome
Appeal allowed with costs, including costs of two counsel. The order of the Full Court is set aside and replaced with an order dismissing the appeal to it with costs.
Judges
Miller, Trengove, Cillié, Galgut, Howard
Legal Topics
Company Articles of Association, Shareholder Rights, Board Powers, Fair Hearing, Transfer of Shares
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Company Articles of Association Shareholder Rights Board Powers Fair Hearing Transfer of Shares

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Afrovan (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Jack Wellsted (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Full Court of Cape Provincial Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the board of Afrovan was entitled to invoke article 36 bis (b) of its Articles of Association against Wellsted following a change in the ownership of Wellsted's major domestic shareholding.
  2. 2 Whether Wellsted was afforded a proper and fair hearing before the board's decision to require surrender of its shares.
  3. 3 Whether the board's decision was based on correct information regarding the change in shareholding.

Ratio Decidendi

The board of Afrovan was entitled to act on the information provided by Wellsted's representative, which acknowledged a change in the ownership of Wellsted's major domestic shareholding. The application to retain the Afrovan franchise was itself an admission that such a change had occurred, triggering the board's powers under article 36 bis (b). The board's decision was reasonable and in line with the purpose of the Articles, which aim to maintain high standards among consortium members. The procedure followed at the meeting was fair; Wellsted's representative was given an opportunity to address the board, and his absence during deliberations was by agreement. There was no evidence that...

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed with costs, including costs of two counsel. The order of the Full Court is set aside and replaced with an order dismissing the appeal to it with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
  • The order of the Full Court is set aside.