Ali and Others Minister of Home Affairs and Another (15566/2016) [2017] ZAWCHC 94; 2018 (1) SA 633 (WCC) (7 September 2017)
Section 4(3) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 applies to persons who meet its requirements, irrespective of whether they were born before or after 1 January 2013, provided they attained majority after the section came into force. The applicants only became eligible to apply for citizenship after the enactment of section 4(3), and no vested rights are affected. The respondents' refusal to process their applications infringes their constitutional rights to equality and dignity. The court declines to order the direct granting of citizenship, as this would constitute judicial overreach, but orders the respondents to accept and process the applications within ten days and to...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAWCHC 94
- Parties
- Applicant: Miriam Ali; Applicant: Aden Nuredin Salih; Applicant: Kanu Teka Jorsen Nkololo; Applicant: Farieda Nsoki; Applicant: Caroline Masuku; Applicant: Murphy Ngaga; Respondent: Minister of Home Affairs; Respondent: Director-General of Home Affairs
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 September 2017
- Case Number
- 15566/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Opposed Motion for Declaratory and Mandatory Relief
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; respondents ordered to accept and process citizenship applications under section 4(3) and to enact necessary forms.
- Judges
- E D Wille
- Legal Topics
- Citizenship by Birth, Retrospective Application of Statutes, Bill of Rights Limitation, Equality Before the Law, Human Dignity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miriam Ali
Applicant
Aden Nuredin Salih
Applicant
Kanu Teka Jorsen Nkololo
Applicant
Farieda Nsoki
Applicant
Caroline Masuku
Applicant
Murphy Ngaga
Applicant
Minister of Home Affairs
Respondent
Director-General of Home Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Opposed Motion for Declaratory and Mandatory Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 4(3) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 apply to persons born before 1 January 2013 who attained majority after that date.
- 2 Are the respondents obliged to accept and process citizenship applications under section 4(3) from applicants who meet the statutory requirements.
- 3 Does the respondents' refusal to process such applications infringe constitutional rights to equality and dignity.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 4(3) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 applies to persons who meet its requirements, irrespective of whether they were born before or after 1 January 2013, provided they attained majority after the section came into force. The applicants only became eligible to apply for citizenship after the enactment of section 4(3), and no vested rights are affected. The respondents' refusal to process their applications infringes their constitutional rights to equality and dignity. The court declines to order the direct granting of citizenship, as this would constitute judicial overreach, but orders the respondents to accept and process the applications within ten days and to...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; respondents ordered to accept and process citizenship applications under section 4(3) and to enact necessary forms.
Orders
- The respondents are to forthwith accept applications on affidavit from each of the applicants (excluding the fourth applicant) for the granting of South African citizenship in terms of section 4(3) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 and to decide on each such application within ten days of receipt.
- Section 4(3) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 applies to persons who meet the requirements of that section, irrespective of whether they were born before or after 1 January 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment