Alto Management CC v Wingtip Crossing Shopping Centre (Pty) Ltd (59545/2018) [2024] ZAGPPHC 808 (12 August 2024)

Alto Management CC v Wingtip Crossing Shopping Centre (Pty) Ltd (59545/2018) [2024] ZAGPPHC 808 (12 August 2024)

The court held that interim payment certificates issued and signed by the quantity surveyor and certified by the principal agent constitute liquid documents binding on the employer, Wingtip. Wingtip's defences, including alleged overpayment, disputes regarding bulk earthworks, and claims of work not performed by Alto, do not constitute valid grounds to refuse payment under the certificates. The arbitration clause was not properly invoked, as no notice of disagreement was given as required by the contract. The disputes raised by Wingtip are not real, genuine, or bona fide within the ambit of payment certificates, and Wingtip's remedy lies against its agents for any negligence, not against...

Citation
[2024] ZAGPPHC 808
Parties
Applicant: Alto Management CC; Respondent: Wingtip Crossing Shopping Centre (Pty) Ltd
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 August 2024
Case Number
59545/2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application granted in favour of the applicant.
Judges
S J R Mogagabe
Legal Topics
Building Contracts, Interim Payment Certificates, Liquid Documents, Summary Judgment, Arbitration Clauses
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Building Contracts Interim Payment Certificates Liquid Documents Summary Judgment Arbitration Clauses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alto Management CC

Applicant

Wingtip Crossing Shopping Centre (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to payment of the sum claimed in terms of interim payment certificates.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be stayed pending referral to arbitration.
  3. 3 Whether the application should be dismissed or referred to trial due to alleged material disputes of fact.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that interim payment certificates issued and signed by the quantity surveyor and certified by the principal agent constitute liquid documents binding on the employer, Wingtip. Wingtip's defences, including alleged overpayment, disputes regarding bulk earthworks, and claims of work not performed by Alto, do not constitute valid grounds to refuse payment under the certificates. The arbitration clause was not properly invoked, as no notice of disagreement was given as required by the contract. The disputes raised by Wingtip are not real, genuine, or bona fide within the ambit of payment certificates, and Wingtip's remedy lies against its agents for any negligence, not against...

Court Disposition

Application granted in favour of the applicant.

Orders

  • The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant the sum of R7,022,177.72.
  • The respondent is ordered to pay interest on the aforementioned amount at the prevailing interest rate from 11 April 2016 to date of full and final payment.