AMCU obo Employees Listed in Annexure FA 1 v Patcon Construction and Civil Engineering Contractors (Pty) Ltd (D1489/17) [2017] ZALCD 24; (2018) 39 ILJ 586 (LC) (13 December 2017)
The court found that Patcon initiated retrenchment consultations but unduly curtailed the process after the first phase, refusing to engage in further meaningful consultation as required by section 189A(2) of the LRA. The union's communications and attempts to reopen discussions were rebuffed by Patcon, resulting in a procedurally unfair retrenchment process for employees retrenched in September and October 2017. The court held that AMCU had locus standi to represent the listed employees and that the application was in time for those retrenched within 30 days prior to the application. Given the advanced stage of retrenchments, compensation was deemed the appropriate remedy for those...
- Citation
- [2017] ZALCD 24
- Parties
- Applicant: AMCU obo THE EMPLOYEES LISTED IN ANNEXURE FA 1; Respondent: PATCON CONSTRUCTION AND CIVIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS (PTY) LTD
- Court
- Labour Court Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2017
- Case Number
- D1489/17
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application in Terms of Section 189 A(13) of the LRA for Relief Regarding Procedural Unfairness in Retrenchment Consultations.
- Outcome
- Application partially granted. Compensation awarded to employees retrenched in September and October 2017; interdict against further retrenchments for remaining employees for two weeks; partial costs awarded to applicants.
- Judges
- Lagrange
- Legal Topics
- Retrenchment Procedure, Section 189a Consultation, Procedural Unfairness, Compensation for Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AMCU obo THE EMPLOYEES LISTED IN ANNEXURE FA 1
Applicant
PATCON CONSTRUCTION AND CIVIL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS (PTY) LTD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application in Terms of Section 189 A(13) of the LRA for Relief Regarding Procedural Unfairness in Retrenchment Consultations.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent complied with a fair consultation procedure as required by section 189A of the LRA.
- 2 Whether AMCU had locus standi to represent the employees listed in Annexure FA1.
- 3 Whether the application was brought within the time limits prescribed by section 189A(17) of the LRA.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Patcon initiated retrenchment consultations but unduly curtailed the process after the first phase, refusing to engage in further meaningful consultation as required by section 189A(2) of the LRA. The union's communications and attempts to reopen discussions were rebuffed by Patcon, resulting in a procedurally unfair retrenchment process for employees retrenched in September and October 2017. The court held that AMCU had locus standi to represent the listed employees and that the application was in time for those retrenched within 30 days prior to the application. Given the advanced stage of retrenchments, compensation was deemed the appropriate remedy for those...
Court Disposition
Application partially granted. Compensation awarded to employees retrenched in September and October 2017; interdict against further retrenchments for remaining employees for two weeks; partial costs awarded to applicants.
Orders
- The matter is dealt with as one of urgency and forms and service are dispensed with.
- Within 10 days, the respondent must pay compensation equivalent to four weeks' remuneration at the respective rates of termination to each employee listed in Annexure FA1 retrenched at the end of September or on or about 13 October 2017, or who received notices of termination for operational reasons not more than 30...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment