Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Amdec Investments (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission (016782) [2013] ZACT 50 (12 June 2013)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that, as the merger between Amdec Investments (Proprietary) Ltd and Leaf Property Fund Trust was abandoned and both parties agreed, the refund of the merger notification fee was warranted under the applicable Tribunal Rules. The order was made by agreement and in accordance with the procedural rules governing abandoned mergers and fee refunds.

Court disposition

Application granted by agreement; refund of merger notification fee ordered.

Orders

  • The Competition Commission must refund the applicant the amount of R 175 000.00 paid in respect of the abandoned merger between Amdec Investments (Proprietary) Ltd and Leaf Property Fund Trust.

02

Material facts

Parties

Amdec Investments (Proprietary) Limited

Applicant

Competition Commission

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Refunded Merger Notification Fee: ZAR 175,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Stay Application / Order Issued After Application Under Rule 34(2)(b) and Rule 31(1)(f) by Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant submitted that the merger between Amdec Investments (Proprietary) Ltd and Leaf Property Fund Trust was abandoned and, in terms of the Tribunal Rules, the merger notification fee paid should be refunded.
Respondent
The Competition Commission agreed to the refund of the merger notification fee paid by the applicant for the abandoned merger, as provided for under the relevant Tribunal Rules.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 34(2)(b) and Rule 31(1)(f) of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Competition Tribunal

    Where a merger is abandoned, the Tribunal may order the refund of the merger notification fee paid, in accordance with Rule 34(2)(b) and Rule 31(1)(f) of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Competition Tribunal.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that, as the merger between Amdec Investments (Proprietary) Ltd and Leaf Property Fund Trust was abandoned and both parties agreed, the refund of the merger notification fee was warranted under the applicable Tribunal Rules. The order was made by agreement and in accordance with the procedural rules governing abandoned mergers and fee refunds.

Court disposition

Application granted by agreement; refund of merger notification fee ordered.

  • The Competition Commission must refund the applicant the amount of R 175 000.00 paid in respect of the abandoned merger between Amdec Investments (Proprietary) Ltd and Leaf Property Fund Trust.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2013] ZACT 50

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No.: 016782

In the matter between:

Amdec Investments (Proprietary) Limited

And

The Competition Commission

Panel N Manoim (Presiding Member), A Ndoni (Tribunal Member) and T Madima (Tribunal Member)

Heard on 12 June 2013

Decided on 12 June 2013

ORDER

Further to the application by the Applicant in terms of Rule 34(2)(b) of the Rules for the conduct of Proceedings in the Competition Commission and in accordance with Rule 31(1)(f) of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Competition Tribunal and by agreement between the Applicant and the Competition Commission, the Competition Tribunal orders that -

1. The Commission refund the Applicant the amount of R 175 000.00(one hundred and seventy five thousand rands) paid in respect of the abandoned merger between Amdec Investments (Proprietary) Ltd and Leaf Property Fund Trust

Presiding Member

N Manoim

Concurring: M Mazwai and N Ndoni

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Rule 34(2)(b) of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Competition Tribunal

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Rule 31(1)(f) of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Competition Tribunal

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.