Amiss and Another v F E Industrial Supplies CC (002313/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 730 (21 July 2025)

Amiss and Another v F E Industrial Supplies CC (002313/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 730 (21 July 2025)

The defendant's plea and affidavit, though not exhaustive, disclose sufficient material facts and a bona fide defence based on an alleged breach of the restraint of trade clause in the subcontractor's Agreement. The defendant has provided details of the breach, the customer involved, and quantification of damages, meeting the requirements of Rule 32(3)(b). The plaintiffs did not specifically deny the alleged breach or the resulting financial loss. Both parties rely on separate agreements, and the interpretation of these contracts and the validity of the counterclaim require determination at trial. The defendant's defence is neither a sham nor mala fide and is valid in law. Accordingly,...

Citation
[2025] ZAGPJHC 730
Parties
Plaintiff: Broughton Clinton Amiss N.O.; Plaintiff: Julieann Amiss N.O.; Defendant: F E Industrial Supplies CC
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
21 July 2025
Case Number
002313/2024
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment; Interlocutory Stage Before Trial
Outcome
Summary judgment refused; defendant granted leave to defend; costs awarded to defendant.
Judges
Mahosi
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Contractual Breach, Counterclaim, Restraint of Trade, Liquidated Claim
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Summary Judgment Contractual Breach Counterclaim Restraint of Trade Liquidated Claim

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Broughton Clinton Amiss N.O.

Plaintiff

Julieann Amiss N.O.

Plaintiff

F E Industrial Supplies CC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment; Interlocutory Stage Before Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's plea and affidavit disclose a bona fide defence to the plaintiffs' claim for payment under a credit agreement.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant's counterclaim for damages arising from alleged breach of restraint of trade clause constitutes a valid defence to summary judgment.
  3. 3 Whether clause 27.1 of the Agreement excludes the defendant's right to raise a counterclaim or set-off.

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's plea and affidavit, though not exhaustive, disclose sufficient material facts and a bona fide defence based on an alleged breach of the restraint of trade clause in the subcontractor's Agreement. The defendant has provided details of the breach, the customer involved, and quantification of damages, meeting the requirements of Rule 32(3)(b). The plaintiffs did not specifically deny the alleged breach or the resulting financial loss. Both parties rely on separate agreements, and the interpretation of these contracts and the validity of the counterclaim require determination at trial. The defendant's defence is neither a sham nor mala fide and is valid in law. Accordingly,...

Court Disposition

Summary judgment refused; defendant granted leave to defend; costs awarded to defendant.

Orders

  • Summary judgment is refused.
  • The defendant is granted leave to defend the main action.