Anglo American PLC v Samancor Holdings Proprietary Limited and Others (019901) [2015] ZACT 2 (7 January 2015)
- Citation
- [2015] ZACT 2
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Andreas Wessels, Mondo Mazwai, Imraan Valodia
- Case number
- 019901
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Andreas Wessels, Mondo Mazwai, Imraan Valodia
- Case number
- 019901
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the transaction constitutes an acquisition of control as defined in section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act, due to Anglo American acquiring additional governance rights over Samancor. The Commission's assessment established that there is no horizontal overlap in the parties' activities, as Anglo American's involvement in manganese is solely through its existing shareholding in Samancor. The transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that there would be no adverse impact on employment or other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.
Court disposition
The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The acquisition by Anglo American PLC of joint control over Samancor Holdings Proprietary Limited, Groote Eylandt Mining Company Proprietary Limited, and Samancor AG is approved unconditionally.
02
Material facts
Parties
Anglo American PLC
Applicant Counsel: Anton RoetsSamancor Holdings Proprietary Limited
Respondent Counsel: Jean MeijerGroote Eylandt Mining Company Proprietary Limited
RespondentSamancor AG
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Control / Approval of Proposed Transaction
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Does the proposed transaction constitute an acquisition of control under section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act?
- 02
Will the transaction substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market?
- 03
Are there any adverse public interest effects, including on employment?.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Anglo American argued that the transaction involves changes to the governance structure of Samancor, granting Anglo American additional rights such as veto powers over business plans, budgets, material projects, transactions, and senior management appointments. This internal restructuring is part of a broader demerger proposal by BHP Billiton and does not involve a sale or transfer of shares or assets. The transaction will not adversely affect employment or raise other public interest concerns.
- Respondent
- Samancor Holdings and related entities concurred with the applicant, confirming that the transaction is an internal restructuring that does not result in a change of ownership or adverse impact on competition or employment. The Commission submitted that there is no horizontal overlap in the parties' activities, as Anglo American's involvement in manganese is limited to its existing shareholding in Samancor.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, section 12(2)(g)
An acquisition of control includes the acquisition of rights that allow a party to veto business plans, budgets, material projects, transactions, and senior management appointments.
- 02
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998
A merger may not be approved if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 03
Competition Act No. 89 of 1998
Public interest considerations, including employment, must be assessed in merger proceedings.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the transaction constitutes an acquisition of control as defined in section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act, due to Anglo American acquiring additional governance rights over Samancor. The Commission's assessment established that there is no horizontal overlap in the parties' activities, as Anglo American's involvement in manganese is solely through its existing shareholding in Samancor. The transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that there would be no adverse impact on employment or other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the transaction forms part of a broader restructuring by BHP Billiton, but this aspect did not affect the competition assessment.
- No adverse public interest issues, including employment, arise from the transaction.
Court disposition
The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
- The acquisition by Anglo American PLC of joint control over Samancor Holdings Proprietary Limited, Groote Eylandt Mining Company Proprietary Limited, and Samancor AG is approved unconditionally.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: 019901
In the matter between:
ANGLO
AMERICAN PLC........................................................................................Primary Acquiring Firm
And
SAMANCOR
HOLDINGS PROPRIETARY LIMITED.............................................Primary Target Firms
GROOTE EYLANDT
MINING COMPANY
PROPRIETARY
LIMITED
SAMANCOR AG
Panel: Andreas Wessels (Presiding Member)
: Mondo Mazwai (Tribunal Member)
: Prof Imraan Valodia (Tribunal Member)
Heard on: 10 December 2014
Order Issued on : 10 December 2014
Reasons Issued on : 07 January 2015
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On 10 December 2014, the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) unconditionally approved the acquisition by Anglo American Pic (“Anglo American”) of joint control over Samancor Holdings Proprietary Limited (“Samancor Holdings”),
Groote Eylandt Mining Company Proprietary Limited (“GEMCO”) and Samancor AG (collectively referred to as “Samancor”).
[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.
Parties to transaction
Primary acquiring firm
[3] The primary acquiring firm is Anglo American, a company incorporated in accordance with the company laws of England. Anglo American is a public company with a premium listing on the London Stock Exchange and secondary listings on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, SWX Swiss Exchange, Botswana Stock Exchange and Namibian Stock Exchange. Anglo American is not controlled by any single shareholder.
[4] Relevant for purposes of the competition assessment of this transaction is that Samancor is a manganese joint venture in terms of which BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Pic (collectively referred to as BHP Billiton) holds 60% of the issued share capital, while Anglo American holds the remaining 40%.
[5] Anglo American has a portfolio of mining assets and natural resources which includes platinum group metals, diamonds, copper, iron ore, metallurgical coal, nickel, niobium and thermal coal, as well as interests in the production of manganese ore and manganese alloys through its interest in Samancor.
Primary target firms
[6] The primary target firms are Samancor (Samancor Holdings, GEMCO and Samancor AG). Samancor Holdings is a firm incorporated in terms of the laws of South Africa. Samancor Holdings holds a 100% interest in GEMCO and Samancor AG.
[7] As stated above, pre-merger Samancor Holdings is controlled by BHP Billiton which holds 60%of its issued share capital, while Anglo American holds the remaining 40%.
[8] Samancor is a producer of manganese ore and manganese alloys in South Africa and in Australia.
[9] BHP Billiton is a public company registered in Australia. BHP Billiton is not controlled by any single firm or individual. BHP Billiton is a global resources company producing commodities such as aluminium, nickel, manganese, coal, copper and iron ore. None of these activities are relevant to this transaction other than manganese.
Proposed transaction and rationale
[10] As discussed above, Samancor is a 60:40 manganese joint venture between BHP Billiton and Anglo American.
[11] The proposed transaction does not amount to a sale or transfer of shares or assets, but merely makes changes to the governance
structure of Samancor specifically by improving the shareholder rights of Anglo American. As a result of the proposed transaction,
Anglo American will be acquiring additional rights in relation to Samancor including the right to veto the business plan and/or budget, material projects and transactions, as well as the appointment of senior management. This constitutes an acquisition of control for the purposes of section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act1.
[12] The merging parties submitted that that the internal restructuring relating to Samancor is part of a broader proposal by BHP Billiton to demerge certain aspects of its business.
Impact on competition
[13] According to the Commission’s findings, the proposed transaction does not give rise to a horizontal overlap of the merging parties’ activities since Anglo American is not involved in the mining of manganese ore or the production of manganese alloys, other than through its current shareholding in the Samancor joint venture.
[14] We concur with the Commission’s competition assessment, i.e. that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
Public interest
[15] The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will not result in an adverse impact on employment2
[16] The proposed transaction further raises no other public interest concerns.
Conclusion
[17]In light of the above we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transactions. Accordingly we approve the proposed transaction unconditionally.
07 January 2015
DATE
Andreas Wessels
Mondo Mazwai and Imraan Valodia concurring
Tribunal Researcher: Derrick Bowles
For the merging parties: Anton Roets of Nortons Inc for the acquiring firm
Jean Meijer of Bowman Gilfillan for the target firms
For the Commission: Maanda Lambani and Nompucuko Nontombana
1Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended.
2Inter alia merger record page 9.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.