Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Anglo American PLC v Samancor Holdings Proprietary Limited and Others (019901) [2015] ZACT 2 (7 January 2015)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the transaction constitutes an acquisition of control as defined in section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act, due to Anglo American acquiring additional governance rights over Samancor. The Commission's assessment established that there is no horizontal overlap in the parties' activities, as Anglo American's involvement in manganese is solely through its existing shareholding in Samancor. The transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that there would be no adverse impact on employment or other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The acquisition by Anglo American PLC of joint control over Samancor Holdings Proprietary Limited, Groote Eylandt Mining Company Proprietary Limited, and Samancor AG is approved unconditionally.

02

Material facts

Parties

Anglo American PLC

Applicant Counsel: Anton Roets

Samancor Holdings Proprietary Limited

Respondent Counsel: Jean Meijer

Groote Eylandt Mining Company Proprietary Limited

Respondent

Samancor AG

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Control / Approval of Proposed Transaction

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Anglo American argued that the transaction involves changes to the governance structure of Samancor, granting Anglo American additional rights such as veto powers over business plans, budgets, material projects, transactions, and senior management appointments. This internal restructuring is part of a broader demerger proposal by BHP Billiton and does not involve a sale or transfer of shares or assets. The transaction will not adversely affect employment or raise other public interest concerns.
Respondent
Samancor Holdings and related entities concurred with the applicant, confirming that the transaction is an internal restructuring that does not result in a change of ownership or adverse impact on competition or employment. The Commission submitted that there is no horizontal overlap in the parties' activities, as Anglo American's involvement in manganese is limited to its existing shareholding in Samancor.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998, section 12(2)(g)

    An acquisition of control includes the acquisition of rights that allow a party to veto business plans, budgets, material projects, transactions, and senior management appointments.

  2. 02

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

    A merger may not be approved if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

  3. 03

    Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

    Public interest considerations, including employment, must be assessed in merger proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the transaction constitutes an acquisition of control as defined in section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act, due to Anglo American acquiring additional governance rights over Samancor. The Commission's assessment established that there is no horizontal overlap in the parties' activities, as Anglo American's involvement in manganese is solely through its existing shareholding in Samancor. The transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, the merging parties confirmed that there would be no adverse impact on employment or other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the transaction forms part of a broader restructuring by BHP Billiton, but this aspect did not affect the competition assessment.
  • No adverse public interest issues, including employment, arise from the transaction.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

  • The acquisition by Anglo American PLC of joint control over Samancor Holdings Proprietary Limited, Groote Eylandt Mining Company Proprietary Limited, and Samancor AG is approved unconditionally.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2015] ZACT 2

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: 019901

In the matter between:

ANGLO

AMERICAN PLC........................................................................................Primary Acquiring Firm

And

SAMANCOR

HOLDINGS PROPRIETARY LIMITED.............................................Primary Target Firms

GROOTE EYLANDT

MINING COMPANY

PROPRIETARY

LIMITED

SAMANCOR AG

Panel: Andreas Wessels (Presiding Member)

: Mondo Mazwai (Tribunal Member)

: Prof Imraan Valodia (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 10 December 2014

Order Issued on : 10 December 2014

Reasons Issued on : 07 January 2015

Reasons for Decision

Approval

[1] On 10 December 2014, the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) unconditionally approved the acquisition by Anglo American Pic (“Anglo American”) of joint control over Samancor Holdings Proprietary Limited (“Samancor Holdings”),

Groote Eylandt Mining Company Proprietary Limited (“GEMCO”) and Samancor AG (collectively referred to as “Samancor”).

[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.

Parties to transaction

Primary acquiring firm

[3] The primary acquiring firm is Anglo American, a company incorporated in accordance with the company laws of England. Anglo American is a public company with a premium listing on the London Stock Exchange and secondary listings on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, SWX Swiss Exchange, Botswana Stock Exchange and Namibian Stock Exchange. Anglo American is not controlled by any single shareholder.

[4] Relevant for purposes of the competition assessment of this transaction is that Samancor is a manganese joint venture in terms of which BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Pic (collectively referred to as BHP Billiton) holds 60% of the issued share capital, while Anglo American holds the remaining 40%.

[5] Anglo American has a portfolio of mining assets and natural resources which includes platinum group metals, diamonds, copper, iron ore, metallurgical coal, nickel, niobium and thermal coal, as well as interests in the production of manganese ore and manganese alloys through its interest in Samancor.

Primary target firms

[6] The primary target firms are Samancor (Samancor Holdings, GEMCO and Samancor AG). Samancor Holdings is a firm incorporated in terms of the laws of South Africa. Samancor Holdings holds a 100% interest in GEMCO and Samancor AG.

[7] As stated above, pre-merger Samancor Holdings is controlled by BHP Billiton which holds 60%of its issued share capital, while Anglo American holds the remaining 40%.

[8] Samancor is a producer of manganese ore and manganese alloys in South Africa and in Australia.

[9] BHP Billiton is a public company registered in Australia. BHP Billiton is not controlled by any single firm or individual. BHP Billiton is a global resources company producing commodities such as aluminium, nickel, manganese, coal, copper and iron ore. None of these activities are relevant to this transaction other than manganese.

Proposed transaction and rationale

[10] As discussed above, Samancor is a 60:40 manganese joint venture between BHP Billiton and Anglo American.

[11] The proposed transaction does not amount to a sale or transfer of shares or assets, but merely makes changes to the governance

structure of Samancor specifically by improving the shareholder rights of Anglo American. As a result of the proposed transaction,

Anglo American will be acquiring additional rights in relation to Samancor including the right to veto the business plan and/or budget, material projects and transactions, as well as the appointment of senior management. This constitutes an acquisition of control for the purposes of section 12(2)(g) of the Competition Act1.

[12] The merging parties submitted that that the internal restructuring relating to Samancor is part of a broader proposal by BHP Billiton to demerge certain aspects of its business.

Impact on competition

[13] According to the Commission’s findings, the proposed transaction does not give rise to a horizontal overlap of the merging parties’ activities since Anglo American is not involved in the mining of manganese ore or the production of manganese alloys, other than through its current shareholding in the Samancor joint venture.

[14] We concur with the Commission’s competition assessment, i.e. that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

Public interest

[15] The merging parties confirmed that the proposed transaction will not result in an adverse impact on employment2

[16] The proposed transaction further raises no other public interest concerns.

Conclusion

[17]In light of the above we conclude that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transactions. Accordingly we approve the proposed transaction unconditionally.

07 January 2015

DATE

Andreas Wessels

Mondo Mazwai and Imraan Valodia concurring

Tribunal Researcher: Derrick Bowles

For the merging parties: Anton Roets of Nortons Inc for the acquiring firm

Jean Meijer of Bowman Gilfillan for the target firms

For the Commission: Maanda Lambani and Nompucuko Nontombana

1Act No. 89 of 1998, as amended.

2Inter alia merger record page 9.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.