Anglo Operations v CCMA (JR1263/01) [2002] ZALCJHB 5 (5 March 2002)

Anglo Operations v CCMA (JR1263/01) [2002] ZALCJHB 5 (5 March 2002)

The court found that the commissioner did not properly consider the condonation application for the late referral of the dispute, which was delayed by 18 months. The decision to grant condonation was not justified on the papers and submissions before the court. Accordingly, the ruling condoning the late referral was reviewed and set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration by a different arbitrator or commissioner.

Citation
[2002] ZALCJHB 5
Parties
Applicant: Anglo Operations; Respondent: CCMA; Respondent: Mr Barios
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
5 March 2002
Case Number
JR1263/01
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application for review granted; condonation decision set aside; matter remitted for fresh consideration.
Judges
E. Revelas
Legal Topics
Condonation of Late Referral, Review of Arbitration Award, Labour Relations Act Section 191
Labour Law Civil Procedure Condonation of Late Referral Review of Arbitration Award Labour Relations Act Section 191

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anglo Operations

Applicant

CCMA

Respondent

Mr Barios

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the commissioner properly considered the condonation application for the late referral of the dispute.
  2. 2 Whether the decision to grant condonation for an 18-month late referral was justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the commissioner did not properly consider the condonation application for the late referral of the dispute, which was delayed by 18 months. The decision to grant condonation was not justified on the papers and submissions before the court. Accordingly, the ruling condoning the late referral was reviewed and set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration by a different arbitrator or commissioner.

Court Disposition

Application for review granted; condonation decision set aside; matter remitted for fresh consideration.

Orders

  • The decision of the arbitrator or commissioner dated 24 July 2001 to condone the late referral of the dispute is reviewed and set aside.
  • The certificate of outcome under case number GA6000/2001 is set aside.