Anglo Platinum (Pty) Ltd (Bafokeng Rasemone Mine) v De Beer and Others (JA 65/13) [2014] ZALAC 82; [2015] 4 BLLR 394 (LAC) ; (2015) 36 ILJ 1453 (LAC) (15 December 2014)
The Labour Appeal Court found that the CCMA commissioner's decision upholding the dismissal of the employee for breaching the employer's gifts and favours policy was reasonable and supported by the evidence. The employee was aware of the policy and the prohibition against accepting favours from suppliers, and his conduct in accepting and failing to declare a favour constituted dishonesty. The commissioner’s finding that the employment relationship was destroyed and that dismissal was appropriate fell within the range of reasonable responses. The Labour Court erred by substituting its own view and failing to apply the correct review test, which requires consideration of whether the result...
- Citation
- [2014] ZALAC 82
- Parties
- Appellant: Anglo Platinum (Pty) Ltd (Bafokeng Rasemone Mine); Respondent: Petrus Hermanus De Beer; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner L.M. Matlala N.O.
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2014
- Case Number
- JA 65/13
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Reviewing CCMA Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Labour Court’s order set aside; review application dismissed.
- Judges
- Waglay, Dlodlo, Setiloane
- Legal Topics
- Substantive Fairness of Dismissal, Dishonesty, Breach of Gifts and Favours Policy, Review of Arbitration Award, Employment Relationship Breakdown
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anglo Platinum (Pty) Ltd (Bafokeng Rasemone Mine)
Appellant
Petrus Hermanus De Beer
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner L.M. Matlala N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Reviewing CCMA Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employee breached the employer's policy prohibiting acceptance of gifts, hospitality, or favours from suppliers.
- 2 Whether the employee's conduct constituted dishonesty justifying dismissal.
- 3 Whether the CCMA commissioner's award upholding dismissal was reasonable and reviewable.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court found that the CCMA commissioner's decision upholding the dismissal of the employee for breaching the employer's gifts and favours policy was reasonable and supported by the evidence. The employee was aware of the policy and the prohibition against accepting favours from suppliers, and his conduct in accepting and failing to declare a favour constituted dishonesty. The commissioner’s finding that the employment relationship was destroyed and that dismissal was appropriate fell within the range of reasonable responses. The Labour Court erred by substituting its own view and failing to apply the correct review test, which requires consideration of whether the result...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Labour Court’s order set aside; review application dismissed.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with no order as to costs.
- The order of the Labour Court in the review application is set aside and replaced with: 'the review application is dismissed with costs.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment