Appelgryn N.O. and Another v Jankielsohn and Others (3809/2016) [2017] ZAFSHC 4 (19 January 2017)
The applicants established a prima facie right to the red lechwe antelopes based on statutory protection under the Game Theft Act and valid fencing and species permits. The first respondent's possession and dealings with the antelopes constituted restricted activities under the Biodiversity Act, for which she lacked the necessary permits, rendering her opposition unsustainable. The applicants demonstrated a reasonable apprehension of irreparable harm absent interim relief, and no adequate alternative remedy existed. The balance of convenience favoured the applicants, as the proposed procedure would secure the antelopes and allow all interested parties to assert claims in subsequent...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAFSHC 4
- Parties
- Applicant: Johannes Jacobus Appelgryn N.O.; Applicant: Patricia Yvonne van Wyk N.O.; Respondent: Doctor A Jankielsohn; Respondent: Crezco Steel and Hardware Traders (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Doctor Wessels Strydom; Respondent: Free State Provincial Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs; Respondent: South African National Road Agency Limited; Respondent: Isabella Pieters Marco Vermeulen; Respondent: Alida Elizabeth Vermeulen; Respondent: George Pieter Dirk Meiring; Respondent: Susannah Dorothea Kruger; Respondent: Sara Nel
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2017
- Case Number
- 3809/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Application Pending Interpleader Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application granted: interim interdict and mandamus issued in favour of the applicants.
- Judges
- Rampai
- Legal Topics
- Game Theft Act, Alien Species Permits, Interim Interdict, Interpleader Proceedings, Ownership of Wildlife, Restricted Activities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johannes Jacobus Appelgryn N.O.
Applicant
Patricia Yvonne van Wyk N.O.
Applicant
Doctor A Jankielsohn
Respondent
Crezco Steel and Hardware Traders (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Doctor Wessels Strydom
Respondent
Free State Provincial Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs
Respondent
South African National Road Agency Limited
Respondent
Isabella Pieters Marco Vermeulen
Respondent
Alida Elizabeth Vermeulen
Respondent
George Pieter Dirk Meiring
Respondent
Susannah Dorothea Kruger
Respondent
Sara Nel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Application Pending Interpleader Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants established the requisites for an interim interdict to capture and secure red lechwe antelopes pending interpleader proceedings.
- 2 Whether the first respondent's possession and dealings with the antelopes contravened statutory restrictions on alien species.
- 3 Whether the applicants have a prima facie right to the antelopes under the Game Theft Act and Biodiversity Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants established a prima facie right to the red lechwe antelopes based on statutory protection under the Game Theft Act and valid fencing and species permits. The first respondent's possession and dealings with the antelopes constituted restricted activities under the Biodiversity Act, for which she lacked the necessary permits, rendering her opposition unsustainable. The applicants demonstrated a reasonable apprehension of irreparable harm absent interim relief, and no adequate alternative remedy existed. The balance of convenience favoured the applicants, as the proposed procedure would secure the antelopes and allow all interested parties to assert claims in subsequent...
Court Disposition
Application granted: interim interdict and mandamus issued in favour of the applicants.
Orders
- The applicants are authorised to enter the specified farms of the respondents to search for, capture, and remove all specimens of the Red Lechwe Antelope found thereon, without interference.
- Captured antelopes are to be marked for identification and removed to the second respondent's property for temporary safekeeping and central detention.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment