Apple Bite (Pty) Ltd and Another v Applebite Roadhouse (Pty) Ltd and Others (A2023/058069) [2024] ZAGPJHC 22 (12 January 2024)
The court found that the sale of the business as a going concern included the goodwill and the right to use the 'Apple Bite' name and logo, not limited to the original property. The respondents acquired these rights and exercised them at other locations without objection from the appellants. The appellants' subsequent use of the name and logo at the original property and in advertising was a deliberate attempt to piggy-back on the reputation and customer base established by the respondents, constituting passing off and unlawful competition. The suspensive condition in the 2008 sale agreement was waived by conduct, as all parties acted as if the condition had been fulfilled. The...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPJHC 22
- Parties
- Appellant: Apple Bite (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Simul Enterprises CC; Respondent: Applebite Roadhouse (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Gonbar Investments CC t/a Applebite Roadhouse and Pizzeria; Respondent: Alex Jay Catering CC t/a The Applebite Express
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2024
- Case Number
- A2023/058069
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Full Court Appeal From the High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Wright, Sutherland, R Strydom
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Unlawful Competition, Goodwill Transfer, Business Name Rights, Sale of Business, Interdict
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Apple Bite (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Simul Enterprises CC
Appellant
Applebite Roadhouse (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Gonbar Investments CC t/a Applebite Roadhouse and Pizzeria
Respondent
Alex Jay Catering CC t/a The Applebite Express
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Full Court Appeal From the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents acquired the exclusive right to use the 'Apple Bite' name and logo beyond the original property.
- 2 Whether the appellants' use of the 'Apple Bite' name and logo constitutes passing off and unlawful competition.
- 3 Whether the sale of the business included the right to the goodwill and business name at other locations.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sale of the business as a going concern included the goodwill and the right to use the 'Apple Bite' name and logo, not limited to the original property. The respondents acquired these rights and exercised them at other locations without objection from the appellants. The appellants' subsequent use of the name and logo at the original property and in advertising was a deliberate attempt to piggy-back on the reputation and customer base established by the respondents, constituting passing off and unlawful competition. The suspensive condition in the 2008 sale agreement was waived by conduct, as all parties acted as if the condition had been fulfilled. The...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment