A.R.C v A.M.M (076276/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 348 (3 April 2025)

A.R.C v A.M.M (076276/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 348 (3 April 2025)

The court found that the applicant's version of events was not properly disputed, as the respondent's answering affidavit contained only bald allegations unsupported by evidence. The respondent conceded that the applicant is entitled by law to be reflected on the child's birth certificate. The only remaining dispute was the amendment of the child's surname, which the court found was not supported by any substantive reason to deny the applicant's request. The court held that it is in the best interests of the child for contact to be regulated by a court order and for the applicant's name to be reflected on the birth certificate. The issue of the parenting coordinator was deferred to allow...

Citation
[2025] ZAGPJHC 348
Parties
Applicant: ARC; Respondent: AMM
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
3 April 2025
Case Number
076276/2024
Procedural Posture
Family Application / Final Determination
Outcome
Application granted in part; orders made regarding birth certificate amendment, contact, and passport surrender. Parenting coordinator issue deferred.
Judges
Yacoob
Legal Topics
Parental Contact, Birth Certificate Amendment, Best Interests of Child, Parenting Coordinator, International Relocation
Family and Children Parental Contact Birth Certificate Amendment Best Interests of Child Parenting Coordinator International Relocation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ARC

Applicant

AMM

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Application / Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have his name reflected on the minor child's birth certificate.
  2. 2 Whether the minor child's surname should be amended to include the applicant's surname.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order regulating contact with the minor child.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's version of events was not properly disputed, as the respondent's answering affidavit contained only bald allegations unsupported by evidence. The respondent conceded that the applicant is entitled by law to be reflected on the child's birth certificate. The only remaining dispute was the amendment of the child's surname, which the court found was not supported by any substantive reason to deny the applicant's request. The court held that it is in the best interests of the child for contact to be regulated by a court order and for the applicant's name to be reflected on the birth certificate. The issue of the parenting coordinator was deferred to allow...

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; orders made regarding birth certificate amendment, contact, and passport surrender. Parenting coordinator issue deferred.

Orders

  • The applicant's name shall be reflected on the minor child's birth certificate.
  • The minor child's surname shall be amended to include the applicant's surname.