Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union obo Dube v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR 1436/2020) [2022] ZALCJHB 225 (16 August 2022)

Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union obo Dube v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR 1436/2020) [2022] ZALCJHB 225 (16 August 2022)

The Court found that the Third Respondent had raised grounds that warrant consideration by another court and that there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The factual and legal issues presented justify the granting of leave to appeal. Accordingly, leave to appeal is granted, and no order as to costs is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] ZALCJHB 225
Parties
Applicant: Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union obo Dube; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Hendrik Oliphant N.O; Respondent: Murray and Roberts Cementation (Pty) Ltd
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
JR 1436/2020
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment and Order Delivered on 14 June 2022.
Outcome
Leave to appeal is granted. No order as to costs.
Judges
Prinsloo
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospects of Success, Costs Order
Labour Law Leave to Appeal Reasonable Prospects of Success Costs Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union obo Dube

Applicant

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

Hendrik Oliphant N.O

Respondent

Murray and Roberts Cementation (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment and Order Delivered on 14 June 2022.

  1. 1 Whether the Third Respondent has reasonable prospects of success on appeal.
  2. 2 Whether another court may reach a different conclusion on the facts or law.
  3. 3 Whether leave to appeal should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the Third Respondent had raised grounds that warrant consideration by another court and that there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The factual and legal issues presented justify the granting of leave to appeal. Accordingly, leave to appeal is granted, and no order as to costs is made.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal is granted. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is granted.
  • There is no order as to costs.