Attacq Waterfall Investment Company (Pty) Ltd v Pocket 3 and Pocket 24 on Portion 1 of the Waterfall Farm 5 (LM090Sep23) [2023] ZACT 79 (4 December 2023)
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in the relevant market for rentable light industrial property within a 15 km radius in Midrand, as the combined market share of the merging parties would remain below 15%. The Tribunal also...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] ZACT 79
- Parties
- Applicant: Attacq Waterfall Investment Company (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Pocket 3 and Pocket 24 on Portion 1 of the Waterfall Farm 5
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Case Number
- LM090Sep23
- Procedural Posture
- Large Merger / Merger Approval
- Outcome
- The merger is unconditionally approved.
- Judges
- AW Wessels, T Vilakazi, G Budlender
- Legal Topics
- Large Merger Review, Horizontal Overlap, Public Interest Employment, Black Economic Empowerment, Industrial Property Market, Development Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attacq Waterfall Investment Company (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Pocket 3 and Pocket 24 on Portion 1 of the Waterfall Farm 5
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Large Merger / Merger Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger will result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in the relevant market.
- 2 Whether the transaction raises any adverse public interest concerns, including employment and spread of ownership.
- 3 Whether the increase in historically disadvantaged persons (HDPs) shareholding post-merger is sufficient.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in the relevant market for rentable light industrial property within a 15 km radius in Midrand, as the combined market share of the merging parties would remain below 15%. The Tribunal also considered the existence of viable alternatives in the market, such as other large industrial property developments. Regarding public interest, the Tribunal determined that there would be no adverse effect on employment, as neither the Target Firm nor JVCO has employees, and employee representatives raised no concerns. The Tribunal further found that the transaction would increase...
Court Disposition
The merger is unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The proposed transaction is approved without conditions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
46 paragraphs
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case no: LM090Sep23
In the large merger between: Attacq Waterfall Investment Company (Pty) Ltd Primary Acquiring Firm And Pocket 3 and Pocket 24 on Portion 1 of the Waterfall Farm 5 Primary Target Firm
Panel: AW Wessels (Presiding Member) T Vilakazi (Tribunal Member) G Budlender (Tribunal Member) Heard on: 09 November 2023 Order issued on: 10 November 2023 Reasons Issued on: 04 December 2023
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
[1] On 10 November 2023, the Competition Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) unconditionally approved the merger whereby Attacq Waterfall Investment Company Proprietary Limited (“AWIC”) will increase its share in the development rights in respect of two land parcels known as Pocket 3 and Pocket 24 on portion 1 of the Waterfall Farm 5 (“the Development Rights”).
Primary acquiring firm
[2] AWIC is wholly owned and controlled by Attacq Limited (“Attacq”). AWIC holds and controls various real estate portfolios and development and leasehold rights in Waterfall City. AWIC also holds a 23.57% indirect interest in Waterfall JVCO 115 (Pty) Ltd (“JVCO”). Attacq, which operates as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”), is listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Limited (“the JSE”) and is not controlled by any single shareholder. Attacq controls the following firms: Attacq Management Services Proprietary Limited (“AMS”), AWIC, Attacq Ellipse (Pty) Ltd and Attacq the Mix (Pty) Ltd. Attacq, its subsidiaries and all the firms directly and indirectly controlling it, will hereinafter be collectively referred to as the “Acquiring Group”.
Primary target firm
[3] The primary target firm comprises a 50% share in the Development Rights. The Development Rights are currently held by JVCO, a private company registered in accordance with the laws of South Africa. JVCO is currently controlled by Sanlam Life Insurance Limited (“Sanlam Life”), a public company registered in accordance with the laws of South Africa, which holds a 76.43% stake in JVCO. AWIC, the Acquiring Firm, holds the remaining 23.57% in JVCO.
[4] Sanlam Life is listed on the JSE and is not directly or indirectly owned by any firm. JVCO wholly owns and controls the Development Rights. The Development Rights do not control any firms. The Development Rights will hereinafter be collectively referred to as the “Target Firm”.
Proposed transaction and rationale
[5] In terms of the proposed transaction AWIC will increase its share in the Target Firm from 23.57% to 50%.
[6] The Acquiring Group submitted that its rationale for the proposed transaction is that the shareholders agreement provides for the opportunity for AWIC to increase its shareholding in JVCO (and hence in respect of the Development Rights) to 50% (“the Option”). AWIC exercised the Option on 29 June 2022.
[7] The Target Firm submitted that the proposed transaction is a consequence of the exercise of a call option by AWIC.
Competition assessment
[8] The Competition Commission (“Commission”) found that proposed transaction gives rise to a horizontal overlap as the Acquiring Group owns a portfolio of light industrial properties and the Development Rights will be developed into industrial properties.
[9] Further, the merger parties have a pre-existing vertical relationship. AMS, the Acquiring Group’s subsidiary, has been appointed to conduct development management services and once the developments on Waterfall Farm are completed, AMS will perform asset management and property management services. According to the Commission’s assessment, it is unlikely that any substantial foreclosure concerns will arise from this relationship as AMS will continue to provide its development management, asset management and property management services to other developing properties. Therefore, we do not deal with this issue any further in these reasons.
[10] The Commission assessed the horizontal competition effects of the proposed transaction in the market for rentable light industrial property within a 15 km radius of the Target Firm’s rentable light industrial properties in Midrand.
[11] The Commission found that the merger parties will have a combined market share of less than 15% in the abovementioned market.
[12] Having considered the above, and that there are viable alternatives, such as two additional large industrial property developments (Simmer & Jack and Randport), in the relevant market, we do not consider it likely that the proposed merger will result in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition in the relevant market.
Public interest
Employment
[13] The merging parties submitted that there will be no adverse effect on employment.
[14] The Target Firm does not have any employees, it comprises Development Rights which have not yet been developed. JVCO, the seller, also does not have any employees. The Commission engaged the employee representatives of the Acquiring Group, who confirmed that there were no concerns raised by the employees regarding the proposed transaction.
[15] Considering the above, we are of the view that the proposed transaction does not raise any employment concerns.
Spread of ownership
[16] The merger parties submitted that the Acquiring Group has a 28.63% shareholding by historically disadvantaged persons (“HDPs”) using a normal flow-through principle and 33.47% based on the modified flow-through principle. The shareholding is held by Attacq and is based on Attacq’s black economic empowerment (“BEE”) certificate dated 29 September 2023 which expires on 28 September 2024.
[17] The Target Firm’s pre-merger HDP shareholding is 29.76%,[1] based on the HDP shareholding of the two shareholders pre-mergers, AWIC,[2] and Sanlam.[3]
[18] The overall HDP shareholding in the Target Firm will increase to 30.73% post- merger. The post-merger HDP shareholding is calculated as follows:
18.1.
AWIC currently has a HDPs shareholding of 33.47% and AWIC will hold 50% of the shares in the Target Firm which means the HDP share in the Target Firm attributable to AWIC is 16.73%, and
18.2.
Sanlam Limited currently has a HDP shareholding of 28% and Sanlam will hold 50% of the shares in the Target Firm which means the HDP shareholding in the Target Firm attributable to 14%.
Other public interest issues
[19] The proposed transaction raises no other public interest issues.
Conclusion
[20] Given the above, we unconditionally approve the proposed transaction.
04 December 2023
Mr Andreas Wessels Date
Prof Thando Vilakazi and Adv Geoff Budlender SC
Tribunal Case Manager: Theodora Michaletos For the Merging Parties: Justin Balkin and Preanka Gounden of ENSAfrica For the Commission: Tamara Paremoer, Makati Seekane and Ratshi Maphwanya
[1] K2018366052 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd and Castleview Property Fund Ltd (LM065Jul22.).
[2] Attacq wholly owns AWIC, which in turn holds a 23.57% of the issued share capital of the seller, JVCO.
[3] Sanlam holds 76.4% of the issued share capital of the seller, JVCO. Based on Sanlam’s BEE certificate dated 9 March 2023, which expires 9 March 2024.