Aunde South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (DA 10/09) [2011] ZALAC 12; [2011] 10 BLLR 945 (LAC); (2011) 32 ILJ 2617 (LAC) (20 June 2011)

Aunde South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (DA 10/09) [2011] ZALAC 12; [2011] 10 BLLR 945 (LAC); (2011) 32 ILJ 2617 (LAC) (20 June 2011)

The Labour Appeal Court held that the appellant was obliged to consult the respondent union before retrenching its members. The recognition agreement with UASA did not contain a negotiated retrenchment procedure, and clause 16 specifically contemplated that such a procedure would be negotiated in future. At the time of the retrenchment, no such procedure existed. Furthermore, the collective agreement between the appellant and the respondent union was still in force and had not been terminated, obliging the appellant to consult the respondent. The consultation process with the respondent was incomplete, and the appellant's reliance on the recognition agreement with UASA was misplaced. The...

Citation
[2011] ZALAC 12
Parties
Appellant: Aunde South Africa (Pty) Limited; Respondent: National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa
Court
Labour Appeal Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
20 June 2011
Case Number
DA 10/09
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Appeal Against Labour Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Tlaletsi JA, Mlambo JP, Mailula AJA
Legal Topics
Procedural Fairness, Collective Agreements, Consultation in Retrenchment, Recognition Agreements, Section 189 Lra, Majority Union Representation
Labour Law Civil Procedure Procedural Fairness Collective Agreements Consultation in Retrenchment Recognition Agreements Section 189 Lra Majority Union Representation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aunde South Africa (Pty) Limited

Appellant

National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Appeal / Appeal Against Labour Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was obliged to consult the respondent union before retrenching its members.
  2. 2 Whether the recognition agreement with UASA relieved the appellant of its duty to consult the respondent.
  3. 3 Whether the retrenchment of the respondent's members was procedurally fair.

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Appeal Court held that the appellant was obliged to consult the respondent union before retrenching its members. The recognition agreement with UASA did not contain a negotiated retrenchment procedure, and clause 16 specifically contemplated that such a procedure would be negotiated in future. At the time of the retrenchment, no such procedure existed. Furthermore, the collective agreement between the appellant and the respondent union was still in force and had not been terminated, obliging the appellant to consult the respondent. The consultation process with the respondent was incomplete, and the appellant's reliance on the recognition agreement with UASA was misplaced. The...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.