Avalon Group (Pty) Ltd and Another and Old Mutual Properties and Others (02/CR/Jan01,25/CR/May01) [2002] ZACT 44 (8 July 2002)
The Tribunal found that the November 2001 lease agreement is highly relevant to the relief sought under section 5 of the Competition Act, as adjudication requires consideration of the current lease terms. The Tribunal rejected the respondents' argument that the lease's timing rendered it irrelevant, emphasizing that the evolution of lease terms is material to the dispute. Requests for Old Mutual's marketing plans and source documents were denied due to lack of specificity and insufficient motivation, as the applicants failed to demonstrate their relevance to dominance or market power. The request for Ster-Kinekor's marketing and market research documents was granted, as such information...
- Citation
- [2002] ZACT 44
- Parties
- Applicant: Avalon Group (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Videovision Entertainment (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Old Mutual Properties; Respondent: Old Mutual Life Assurance CO South Africa Ltd; Respondent: Primedia Ltd; Respondent: Ster-Kinekor Films (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 July 2002
- Case Number
- 02/CR/Jan01,25/CR/May01
- Procedural Posture
- Pre Hearing Application / Pre Hearing Conference; Interlocutory Discovery and Postponement Applications
- Outcome
- Discovery of the November 2001 lease and Ster-Kinekor's marketing documents ordered; other discovery requests denied; application to postpone pre-hearing conference refused; costs reserved.
- Judges
- N. Manoim
- Legal Topics
- Discovery Procedure, Dominance, Essential Facility, Exclusionary Act, Vertical Restrictive Practice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Avalon Group (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Videovision Entertainment (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Old Mutual Properties
Respondent
Old Mutual Life Assurance CO South Africa Ltd
Respondent
Primedia Ltd
Respondent
Ster-Kinekor Films (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Pre Hearing Application / Pre Hearing Conference; Interlocutory Discovery and Postponement Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the November 2001 lease agreement between Old Mutual and Ster-Kinekor is relevant and must be discovered.
- 2 Whether Old Mutual and Ster-Kinekor must provide further marketing and market research documents.
- 3 Whether the requests for source documents and marketing plans are overbroad and justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the November 2001 lease agreement is highly relevant to the relief sought under section 5 of the Competition Act, as adjudication requires consideration of the current lease terms. The Tribunal rejected the respondents' argument that the lease's timing rendered it irrelevant, emphasizing that the evolution of lease terms is material to the dispute. Requests for Old Mutual's marketing plans and source documents were denied due to lack of specificity and insufficient motivation, as the applicants failed to demonstrate their relevance to dominance or market power. The request for Ster-Kinekor's marketing and market research documents was granted, as such information...
Court Disposition
Discovery of the November 2001 lease and Ster-Kinekor's marketing documents ordered; other discovery requests denied; application to postpone pre-hearing conference refused; costs reserved.
Orders
- Old Mutual and/or Ster-Kinekor must make discovery of Item 10 in Annexure A to Legh's affidavit, subject to any claim for confidentiality.
- Ster-Kinekor must make discovery of Item 14 in Annexure C to Legh's affidavit, subject to any claim for confidentiality.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment