Avalon Group (Pty) Ltd and Another and Old Mutual Properties and Others (02/CR/Jan01,25/CR/May01) [2002] ZACT 44 (8 July 2002)

Avalon Group (Pty) Ltd and Another and Old Mutual Properties and Others (02/CR/Jan01,25/CR/May01) [2002] ZACT 44 (8 July 2002)

The Tribunal found that the November 2001 lease agreement is highly relevant to the relief sought under section 5 of the Competition Act, as adjudication requires consideration of the current lease terms. The Tribunal rejected the respondents' argument that the lease's timing rendered it irrelevant, emphasizing that the evolution of lease terms is material to the dispute. Requests for Old Mutual's marketing plans and source documents were denied due to lack of specificity and insufficient motivation, as the applicants failed to demonstrate their relevance to dominance or market power. The request for Ster-Kinekor's marketing and market research documents was granted, as such information...

Citation
[2002] ZACT 44
Parties
Applicant: Avalon Group (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Videovision Entertainment (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Old Mutual Properties; Respondent: Old Mutual Life Assurance CO South Africa Ltd; Respondent: Primedia Ltd; Respondent: Ster-Kinekor Films (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
8 July 2002
Case Number
02/CR/Jan01,25/CR/May01
Procedural Posture
Pre Hearing Application / Pre Hearing Conference; Interlocutory Discovery and Postponement Applications
Outcome
Discovery of the November 2001 lease and Ster-Kinekor's marketing documents ordered; other discovery requests denied; application to postpone pre-hearing conference refused; costs reserved.
Judges
N. Manoim
Legal Topics
Discovery Procedure, Dominance, Essential Facility, Exclusionary Act, Vertical Restrictive Practice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Avalon Group (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Videovision Entertainment (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Old Mutual Properties

Respondent

Old Mutual Life Assurance CO South Africa Ltd

Respondent

Primedia Ltd

Respondent

Ster-Kinekor Films (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Pre Hearing Application / Pre Hearing Conference; Interlocutory Discovery and Postponement Applications

  1. 1 Whether the November 2001 lease agreement between Old Mutual and Ster-Kinekor is relevant and must be discovered.
  2. 2 Whether Old Mutual and Ster-Kinekor must provide further marketing and market research documents.
  3. 3 Whether the requests for source documents and marketing plans are overbroad and justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the November 2001 lease agreement is highly relevant to the relief sought under section 5 of the Competition Act, as adjudication requires consideration of the current lease terms. The Tribunal rejected the respondents' argument that the lease's timing rendered it irrelevant, emphasizing that the evolution of lease terms is material to the dispute. Requests for Old Mutual's marketing plans and source documents were denied due to lack of specificity and insufficient motivation, as the applicants failed to demonstrate their relevance to dominance or market power. The request for Ster-Kinekor's marketing and market research documents was granted, as such information...

Court Disposition

Discovery of the November 2001 lease and Ster-Kinekor's marketing documents ordered; other discovery requests denied; application to postpone pre-hearing conference refused; costs reserved.

Orders

  • Old Mutual and/or Ster-Kinekor must make discovery of Item 10 in Annexure A to Legh's affidavit, subject to any claim for confidentiality.
  • Ster-Kinekor must make discovery of Item 14 in Annexure C to Legh's affidavit, subject to any claim for confidentiality.