Avenue Delicatessen and Others v Natal Technikon (187/85) [1985] ZASCA 142; [1986] 2 All SA 1 (A) (29 November 1985)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Deputy Minister had the substantive power under section 2(2) and (3) of the Rent Control Act to withdraw the jurisdiction of the Regional Rent Board over the business premises in question, and that the direct method used in Government Notice 2629/1983 was legally permissible. The reference to the incorrect empowering section did not invalidate the notice. The Court further found that the protection afforded to tenants under the Rent Control Act is co-extensive with the applicability of the Act to controlled premises. Once the premises ceased to be controlled due to the withdrawal of the rent board's jurisdiction, the tenants could no longer invoke...
- Citation
- [1985] ZASCA 142
- Parties
- Appellant: Avenue Delicatessen; Appellant: Scala Cinema; Appellant: Scala Cafe; Appellant: Scarwick Centre (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Scala Groceries; Respondent: Natal Technikon
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 1985
- Case Number
- 187/85
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Natal Provincial Division After Leave to Appeal Was Granted by Petition to the Chief Justice.
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Rabie, Joubert, Van Heerden, Grosskopf, Galgut
- Legal Topics
- Rent Control Act, Ejectment, Accrued Rights, Ministerial Powers, Government Notice, Controlled Premises
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Avenue Delicatessen
Appellant
Scala Cinema
Appellant
Scala Cafe
Appellant
Scarwick Centre (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Scala Groceries
Appellant
Natal Technikon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Natal Provincial Division After Leave to Appeal Was Granted by Petition to the Chief Justice.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants are entitled to rely on the protection of the Rent Control Act to resist ejectment from the premises.
- 2 Whether Government Notice 2629/1983 was validly issued and effective to withdraw the jurisdiction of the Regional Rent Board over the premises.
- 3 Whether tenants acquired vested or accrued rights under the Rent Control Act that survive the withdrawal of rent board jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Deputy Minister had the substantive power under section 2(2) and (3) of the Rent Control Act to withdraw the jurisdiction of the Regional Rent Board over the business premises in question, and that the direct method used in Government Notice 2629/1983 was legally permissible. The reference to the incorrect empowering section did not invalidate the notice. The Court further found that the protection afforded to tenants under the Rent Control Act is co-extensive with the applicability of the Act to controlled premises. Once the premises ceased to be controlled due to the withdrawal of the rent board's jurisdiction, the tenants could no longer invoke...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment