B and Another v Road Accident Fund and Others (1505/2009) [2014] ZAECPEHC 101 (20 February 2014)
The court found, on a holistic assessment of the evidence, that the minor plaintiff would probably have completed matric with exemption and obtained a university degree, progressing to a middle management position. The court accepted the plaintiffs' expert scenario for career progression and applied a contingency deduction of 25% to future loss of earnings, resulting in a capped amount of R6 458 342,00. For general damages, the court considered the severity and permanence of the injuries, the plaintiff's loss of amenities of life, and comparable case law, awarding R2 500 000,00. The court also awarded past medical, caregiving, and travelling expenses as claimed, and ordered the defendant...
- Citation
- [2014] ZAECPEHC 101
- Parties
- Plaintiff: C[...] C[...] B[...]; Plaintiff: Olav Harold Ronaasen NO; Defendant: Road Accident Fund; Defendant: Marlon Paulse; Defendant: Ralton van Rooyen; Defendant: Lion of Africa Insurance Company (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2014
- Case Number
- 1505/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Merits Conceded
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs against the first defendant for damages as specified.
- Judges
- Pickering
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund Act, Quantum of Damages, Loss of Earning Capacity, General Damages, Contingency Deduction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C[...] C[...] B[...]
Plaintiff
Olav Harold Ronaasen NO
Plaintiff
Road Accident Fund
Defendant
Marlon Paulse
Defendant
Ralton van Rooyen
Defendant
Lion of Africa Insurance Company (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Merits Conceded
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for past medical and hospital expenses, past caregiving and travelling expenses, future loss of earning capacity, and general damages arising from catastrophic injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff in a motor vehicle collision.
- 2 What is the probable career path and earning potential of the minor plaintiff but for the accident, and what contingency deduction should be applied.
- 3 What is a fair award for general damages in light of comparable case law and the severity of the injuries.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on a holistic assessment of the evidence, that the minor plaintiff would probably have completed matric with exemption and obtained a university degree, progressing to a middle management position. The court accepted the plaintiffs' expert scenario for career progression and applied a contingency deduction of 25% to future loss of earnings, resulting in a capped amount of R6 458 342,00. For general damages, the court considered the severity and permanence of the injuries, the plaintiff's loss of amenities of life, and comparable case law, awarding R2 500 000,00. The court also awarded past medical, caregiving, and travelling expenses as claimed, and ordered the defendant...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs against the first defendant for damages as specified.
Orders
- Payment of R945 893,68 to first plaintiff for past hospital and medical expenses.
- Payment of R183 300,00 to first plaintiff for past caregiving expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment