B v B (820/2021) [2022] ZASCA 123; 2023 (1) SA 381 (SCA) (22 September 2022)

B v B (820/2021) [2022] ZASCA 123; 2023 (1) SA 381 (SCA) (22 September 2022)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the written agreement for lifelong maintenance and donations between the parties does not conflict with or vary the ante-nuptial contract. The ANC determines the matrimonial property regime, while the agreement is a separate contractual instrument for donations and maintenance, which is permissible under South African law. The agreement does not oust the divorce court's discretion under section 7(2) of the Divorce Act, as the appellant's claim is for specific performance of a contract, not for maintenance under the Divorce Act. The court found that the agreement is valid and enforceable, and the High Court erred in finding otherwise.

Citation
[2022] ZASCA 123
Parties
Appellant: C S B[....]; Respondent: D H B[....]
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 September 2022
Case Number
820/2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria
Outcome
Appeal upheld with costs; High Court order set aside and replaced.
Judges
Van der Merwe, Molemela, Kgoele, Salie-Hlophe, Masipa
Legal Topics
Ante Nuptial Contract, Contractual Maintenance, Specific Performance, Donations Between Spouses
Family and Children Civil Procedure Ante Nuptial Contract Contractual Maintenance Specific Performance Donations Between Spouses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C S B[....]

Appellant

D H B[....]

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Is the written agreement for lifelong maintenance enforceable alongside the ante-nuptial contract.
  2. 2 Does the agreement impermissibly vary the ante-nuptial contract or the matrimonial regime.
  3. 3 Does the agreement oust the divorce court's discretion under section 7(2) of the Divorce Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the written agreement for lifelong maintenance and donations between the parties does not conflict with or vary the ante-nuptial contract. The ANC determines the matrimonial property regime, while the agreement is a separate contractual instrument for donations and maintenance, which is permissible under South African law. The agreement does not oust the divorce court's discretion under section 7(2) of the Divorce Act, as the appellant's claim is for specific performance of a contract, not for maintenance under the Divorce Act. The court found that the agreement is valid and enforceable, and the High Court erred in finding otherwise.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld with costs; High Court order set aside and replaced.

Orders

  • The appeal is upheld with costs.
  • The order of the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria, is set aside and replaced with an order: 'The appeal is dismissed with costs.'