Bachique 746 (Pty) Ltd v Afrikelp (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM274Mar19) [2019] ZACT 47 (28 August 2019)

Bachique 746 (Pty) Ltd v Afrikelp (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM274Mar19) [2019] ZACT 47 (28 August 2019)

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The Commission's concerns regarding potential collusion and information exchange between RMBV and BoE were not supported by the evidence, as both entities are small players in the private equity market, operate in different industries, and face significant competition from other market participants. Furthermore, the transaction would not negatively affect employment or raise other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger unconditionally.

Citation
[2019] ZACT 47
Parties
Applicant: Bachique 746 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Afrikelp (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Afrikelp Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Afrikelp Investments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Akusa, Inc.; Respondent: Taurus Chemicals Namibia (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Taurus Chemicals Cape Kelp (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Rotaq LOderitz (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Efekto Care (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Efekto Zambia Ltd; Respondent: Agro-Serve (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Agro-Serve (Pty) Ltd (Namibia); Respondent: Marltons Pets and Products (Pty) Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 August 2019
Case Number
LM274Mar19
Procedural Posture
Merger Review / Approval
Outcome
The proposed transaction was approved unconditionally.
Judges
Yasmin Carrim, Andreas Wessels, Fiona Tregenna
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Horizontal and Vertical Overlap, Information Exchange, Collusion Theory, Public Interest Employment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bachique 746 (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Afrikelp (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Afrikelp Holdings (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Afrikelp Investments (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Akusa, Inc.

Respondent

Taurus Chemicals Namibia (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Taurus Chemicals Cape Kelp (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Rotaq LOderitz (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Efekto Care (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Efekto Zambia Ltd

Respondent

Agro-Serve (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Agro-Serve (Pty) Ltd (Namibia)

Respondent

Marltons Pets and Products (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Review / Approval

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger would substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
  2. 2 Whether the joint shareholding of RMBV and BoE in Bidco could facilitate collusion or information exchange between competitors.
  3. 3 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, particularly regarding employment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The Commission's concerns regarding potential collusion and information exchange between RMBV and BoE were not supported by the evidence, as both entities are small players in the private equity market, operate in different industries, and face significant competition from other market participants. Furthermore, the transaction would not negatively affect employment or raise other public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the merger unconditionally.

Court Disposition

The proposed transaction was approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between Bachique 746 (Pty) Ltd and the target businesses is approved without conditions.