Backstrom and Another v La Maison- Hatfield CC (JS81/02) [2002] ZALC 127 (6 March 2002)
The court found that the applicants' claims for outstanding remuneration, leave pay, accommodation pay, and commission were supported by uncontested evidence. As the respondent did not oppose the application or dispute the amounts, the court ordered payment of the specified sums to the applicants.
- Citation
- [2002] ZALC 127
- Parties
- Applicant: Alan Paul Backstrom; Applicant: Sylvia Agatha Backstrom; Respondent: La Maison - Hatfield CC
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 March 2002
- Case Number
- JS81/02
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Uncontested Motion
- Outcome
- Application granted. Orders made for payment of specified amounts to both applicants.
- Judges
- E Revelas
- Legal Topics
- Remuneration Claim, Leave Pay, Commission, Employment Termination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Paul Backstrom
Applicant
Sylvia Agatha Backstrom
Applicant
La Maison - Hatfield CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Uncontested Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent owes the applicants outstanding remuneration, leave pay, accommodation pay, and commission following their resignation.
- 2 Whether the amounts claimed by the applicants are substantiated by evidence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants' claims for outstanding remuneration, leave pay, accommodation pay, and commission were supported by uncontested evidence. As the respondent did not oppose the application or dispute the amounts, the court ordered payment of the specified sums to the applicants.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Orders made for payment of specified amounts to both applicants.
Orders
- The respondent is to pay the first applicant an amount of R47 737.36.
- The respondent is to pay the second applicant an amount of R17 020.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment