Badenhorst and Others v City of Ekurhuleni and Others (52/2023) [2023] ZAGPJHC 289 (4 April 2023)
The application for interim relief fails because the applicants have not demonstrated a prima facie right to the relief sought in Part B, namely entitlement to alternative accommodation. This issue was previously determined by Molahlehi J, who granted an unconditional eviction order and declined to direct provision of alternative accommodation. The applicants have not pursued an appeal or a variation under section 4(12) of the PIE Act, nor have they shown good cause for such variation. The principle of res judicata applies, and the court cannot revisit the merits of the original eviction order. However, due to the likelihood of changed circumstances and in the interests of justice, the...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 289
- Parties
- Applicant: Jerome Badenhorst; Applicant: The Unlawful Occupiers of Immovable Properties at Portion 102 Holgatfontein 36 IR Nigel, also known as Mackenzieville Extension; Respondent: City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: The Sheriff of the High Court, Nigel; Respondent: South African Police Service, Nigel; Respondent: City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Police Dept
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 April 2023
- Case Number
- 52/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Interim Relief (part A) and Associated Reporting Orders (part B)
- Outcome
- Application for interim relief refused; execution of eviction order suspended with conditions.
- Judges
- S D J Wilson
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act, Right to Housing, Interim Relief, Variation of Court Orders, Constitutional Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jerome Badenhorst
Applicant
The Unlawful Occupiers of Immovable Properties at Portion 102 Holgatfontein 36 IR Nigel, also known as Mackenzieville Extension
Applicant
City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
The Sheriff of the High Court, Nigel
Respondent
South African Police Service, Nigel
Respondent
City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Police Dept
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Interim Relief (part A) and Associated Reporting Orders (part B)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to interim relief staying execution of the eviction order pending determination of their entitlement to alternative accommodation.
- 2 Whether the applicants have a prima facie right to alternative accommodation under section 4(12) of the PIE Act.
- 3 Whether the execution of the eviction order should be suspended and conditions imposed to protect constitutional rights.
Ratio Decidendi
The application for interim relief fails because the applicants have not demonstrated a prima facie right to the relief sought in Part B, namely entitlement to alternative accommodation. This issue was previously determined by Molahlehi J, who granted an unconditional eviction order and declined to direct provision of alternative accommodation. The applicants have not pursued an appeal or a variation under section 4(12) of the PIE Act, nor have they shown good cause for such variation. The principle of res judicata applies, and the court cannot revisit the merits of the original eviction order. However, due to the likelihood of changed circumstances and in the interests of justice, the...
Court Disposition
Application for interim relief refused; execution of eviction order suspended with conditions.
Orders
- The relief sought in Part A of the application is refused.
- The execution of the eviction order of Molahlehi J, dated 9 June 2021, is suspended until 5 May 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment