Bader (Bop) (Pty) and Another v National Bargaining Council and Others (JR197/2001) [2001] ZALCJHB 11 (22 August 2001)
The Bargaining Council was not registered for the area in question at the time the dispute arose and therefore lacked jurisdiction to issue the conciliation certificate on 8 February 2001. The correct procedure would have been to refer the dispute to the CCMA. The certificate issued by the Bargaining Council was ultra vires and invalid. The court set aside the certificate and directed the Bargaining Council to conciliate the dispute based on the fresh referral. The court also dispensed with the need for condonation for the late referral, given the circumstances and the conduct of both parties. Costs were awarded to the applicants for their application, while no costs order was made...
- Citation
- [2001] ZALCJHB 11
- Parties
- Applicant: Bader (Bop) (Pty) Limited and Another; Respondent: The National Bargaining Council; Respondent: The National Union of Leather and Allied Workers Union (NULAW); Respondent: Jacob Ramathlo & 426 Others; Respondent: The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2001
- Case Number
- JR197/2001
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- The certificate issued by the Bargaining Council on 8 February 2001 is set aside as invalid. The Bargaining Council is directed to conciliate the dispute within 30 days based on the fresh referral. Costs are awarded to the applicants for their application; no costs order is made regarding the counter application.
- Judges
- Pillay
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Bargaining Council, Conciliation Certificate, Ultra Vires, Condonation, Referral of Dispute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bader (Bop) (Pty) Limited and Another
Applicant
The National Bargaining Council
Respondent
The National Union of Leather and Allied Workers Union (NULAW)
Respondent
Jacob Ramathlo & 426 Others
Respondent
The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bargaining Council had jurisdiction to issue a conciliation certificate on 8 February 2001.
- 2 Whether the certificate issued by the Bargaining Council is valid and enforceable.
- 3 Whether the dispute should have been referred to the CCMA prior to the Bargaining Council's registration.
Ratio Decidendi
The Bargaining Council was not registered for the area in question at the time the dispute arose and therefore lacked jurisdiction to issue the conciliation certificate on 8 February 2001. The correct procedure would have been to refer the dispute to the CCMA. The certificate issued by the Bargaining Council was ultra vires and invalid. The court set aside the certificate and directed the Bargaining Council to conciliate the dispute based on the fresh referral. The court also dispensed with the need for condonation for the late referral, given the circumstances and the conduct of both parties. Costs were awarded to the applicants for their application, while no costs order was made...
Court Disposition
The certificate issued by the Bargaining Council on 8 February 2001 is set aside as invalid. The Bargaining Council is directed to conciliate the dispute within 30 days based on the fresh referral. Costs are awarded to the applicants for their application; no costs order is made regarding the counter application.
Orders
- The certificate issued by the first respondent on 8 February 2001 is invalid and set aside.
- The Bargaining Council is directed to conciliate the dispute on the basis of the fresh referral for conciliation within 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment