Bader SA (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Meditation and Arbitration and Others (JR438/13) [2016] ZALCJHB 550 (20 December 2016)
The Labour Court found that the Commissioner committed gross irregularities by refusing to consider the disciplinary record, contradicting himself regarding dishonesty, and failing to apply his mind to the evidence. The Commissioner unreasonably rejected credible evidence from the Applicant's witnesses and misconstrued the law on inconsistency and procedural fairness. The Court held that Moche's misconduct involved insubordination and dishonesty, which irretrievably breached the trust relationship. The disciplinary process was found to be procedurally fair, with sufficient clarity in the charge and reasonable attempts to consult the union. The arbitration award was not one a reasonable...
- Citation
- [2016] ZALCJHB 550
- Parties
- Applicant: Bader SA (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner G. S. Jansen van Vuuren N.O.; Respondent: Collin Moche
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2016
- Case Number
- JR438/13
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- The review application is granted. The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside. The dismissal of Moche is declared procedurally and substantively fair.
- Judges
- Mothibi
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Insubordination, Dishonesty in Employment, Procedural Fairness, Trust Relationship, Disciplinary Inconsistency
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bader SA (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner G. S. Jansen van Vuuren N.O.
Respondent
Collin Moche
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitration award finding the dismissal of Moche to be procedurally and substantively unfair was reasonable.
- 2 Whether the Commissioner committed gross irregularities in his assessment of evidence and application of law.
- 3 Whether the dismissal of Moche was procedurally and substantively fair.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court found that the Commissioner committed gross irregularities by refusing to consider the disciplinary record, contradicting himself regarding dishonesty, and failing to apply his mind to the evidence. The Commissioner unreasonably rejected credible evidence from the Applicant's witnesses and misconstrued the law on inconsistency and procedural fairness. The Court held that Moche's misconduct involved insubordination and dishonesty, which irretrievably breached the trust relationship. The disciplinary process was found to be procedurally fair, with sufficient clarity in the charge and reasonable attempts to consult the union. The arbitration award was not one a reasonable...
Court Disposition
The review application is granted. The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside. The dismissal of Moche is declared procedurally and substantively fair.
Orders
- The award issued by the Commissioner under case number GATW9896-11 is reviewed and set aside.
- The dismissal of the Third Respondent was procedurally and substantively fair.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment