Baloyi v Minister of Health Gauteng Province (29632/04) [2009] ZAGPPHC 259 (22 July 2009)
The court found that the plaintiff had a pre-existing condition of severe scoliosis and back problems prior to the alleged incident on 8 November 2001. The medical records contradicted the plaintiff's and his wife's testimony that his medical problems began only after the alleged burns. The court found the plaintiff's version of events improbable, including the circumstances of the alleged burning and the lack of immediate pain or medical attention. The plaintiff failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that he was negligently burned by the second defendant or that any such burn caused his subsequent medical conditions and loss of income. Accordingly, the claim was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2009] ZAGPPHC 259
- Parties
- Plaintiff: S Baloyi; Defendant: Minister of Health Gauteng Province; Defendant: Connie Kubu
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2009
- Case Number
- 29632/04
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Merits Separated From Quantum; Judgment on Merits
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Potterill
- Legal Topics
- Medical Negligence, Causation, Burden of Proof, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S Baloyi
Plaintiff
Minister of Health Gauteng Province
Defendant
Connie Kubu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Merits Separated From Quantum; Judgment on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second defendant negligently caused burn wounds to the plaintiff's back during physiotherapy on 8 November 2001.
- 2 Whether the alleged burns caused the plaintiff's subsequent medical conditions and loss of income.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff proved causation between the alleged negligence and his claimed damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had a pre-existing condition of severe scoliosis and back problems prior to the alleged incident on 8 November 2001. The medical records contradicted the plaintiff's and his wife's testimony that his medical problems began only after the alleged burns. The court found the plaintiff's version of events improbable, including the circumstances of the alleged burning and the lack of immediate pain or medical attention. The plaintiff failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that he was negligently burned by the second defendant or that any such burn caused his subsequent medical conditions and loss of income. Accordingly, the claim was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The plaintiff's claim is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment