Bango and Others v Boschpoort Ondernemings (Pty) Ltd (LCC74/20057) [2007] ZALCC 18 (27 July 2007)
The court found that Boschpoort had essentially, if not fully, complied with the Court Order of 16 May 2007. The alleged deficiencies raised by the applicants were either factually unsupported, minor, or did not amount to material non-compliance. The construction of rooms in separate buildings constituted substantial compliance, the quality of the structures was not proven to be sub-standard, the pantry size discrepancy was de minimis, and the electrical and fencing arrangements were reasonable and safe. The applicants had no defensible reason to refuse relocation. However, the respondent's attorney acted improperly by executing the writ while the application was defended, but this did...
- Citation
- [2007] ZALCC 18
- Parties
- Applicant: Motsamaremi Ephlina Bango; Applicant: Phineas Tjanki Mokoena; Applicant: The Further Applicant (3rd to 78th); Respondent: Boschpoort Ondernemings (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Land Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2007
- Case Number
- LCC74/20057
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application to Uplift Suspension of Writ of Ejectment; Determination of Compliance With Prior Court Order
- Outcome
- The suspension of the writ of ejectment is uplifted. Boschpoort Ondernemings (Pty) Ltd is entitled to execute the writ of ejectment against Mr Bango, Mr Mokoena, and all those occupying through or under them. No cost order is made.
- Judges
- Gildenhuys
- Legal Topics
- Relocation of Occupiers, Compliance With Court Order, Writ of Ejectment, Execution Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Motsamaremi Ephlina Bango
Applicant
Phineas Tjanki Mokoena
Applicant
The Further Applicant (3rd to 78th)
Applicant
Boschpoort Ondernemings (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application to Uplift Suspension of Writ of Ejectment; Determination of Compliance With Prior Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Boschpoort Ondernemings (Pty) Ltd complied with the Court Order of 16 May 2007 regarding the construction and provision of accommodation for the Bango and Mokoena families.
- 2 Whether the suspension of the writ of ejectment should be uplifted, permitting relocation of the applicants.
- 3 Whether the applicants have valid grounds to resist relocation based on alleged non-compliance.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Boschpoort had essentially, if not fully, complied with the Court Order of 16 May 2007. The alleged deficiencies raised by the applicants were either factually unsupported, minor, or did not amount to material non-compliance. The construction of rooms in separate buildings constituted substantial compliance, the quality of the structures was not proven to be sub-standard, the pantry size discrepancy was de minimis, and the electrical and fencing arrangements were reasonable and safe. The applicants had no defensible reason to refuse relocation. However, the respondent's attorney acted improperly by executing the writ while the application was defended, but this did...
Court Disposition
The suspension of the writ of ejectment is uplifted. Boschpoort Ondernemings (Pty) Ltd is entitled to execute the writ of ejectment against Mr Bango, Mr Mokoena, and all those occupying through or under them. No cost order is made.
Orders
- The order of 12 July 2007 suspending the writ of ejectment dated 9 July 2007 is uplifted.
- It is declared that Boschpoort Ondernemings (Pty) Ltd is entitled to have the writ of ejectment executed against Mr M E Bango and Mr P T Mokoena, and against all those who occupy Welverdiend through or under them.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment