Barnard and Another v Henderson and Another (2303/2018) [2018] ZANCHC 78 (2 November 2018)
The court found that the applicants are entitled to eviction of the first respondent under section 4(1) read with section 4(7) of the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act. The evidence established that the lease agreement terminated on 31 August 2017, and no valid extension was proven beyond that date. The respondent remained in occupation without paying rent or municipal charges, accumulating substantial arrears. The applicants demonstrated financial hardship, particularly affecting the elderly second applicant, who relies on rental income for her care and accommodation. The respondent's claims regarding repairs and alleged amounts owed were unsupported...
- Citation
- [2018] ZANCHC 78
- Parties
- Applicant: Gertruida Botha/Barnard; Applicant: Gertruida Fleming; Respondent: John-Ross Henderson; Respondent: Sol Plaatje Municipality
- Court
- Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2018
- Case Number
- 2303/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Eviction Application Under PIE Act; Final Order
- Outcome
- Eviction order granted against the first respondent and all persons occupying under him; costs awarded against the first respondent.
- Judges
- BM Pakati
- Legal Topics
- Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act, Unlawful Occupation, Lease Termination, Urgent Eviction, Just and Equitable Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gertruida Botha/Barnard
Applicant
Gertruida Fleming
Applicant
John-Ross Henderson
Respondent
Sol Plaatje Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Eviction Application Under PIE Act; Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have made out a case for the eviction of the first respondent under section 4(1) read with section 4(7) of the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act.
- 2 Whether the requirements for urgent eviction under section 5(1) of the Act have been satisfied.
- 3 Whether the respondent is an unlawful occupier and whether it is just and equitable to grant an eviction order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants are entitled to eviction of the first respondent under section 4(1) read with section 4(7) of the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act. The evidence established that the lease agreement terminated on 31 August 2017, and no valid extension was proven beyond that date. The respondent remained in occupation without paying rent or municipal charges, accumulating substantial arrears. The applicants demonstrated financial hardship, particularly affecting the elderly second applicant, who relies on rental income for her care and accommodation. The respondent's claims regarding repairs and alleged amounts owed were unsupported...
Court Disposition
Eviction order granted against the first respondent and all persons occupying under him; costs awarded against the first respondent.
Orders
- Mr John-Ross Henderson and all persons occupying the immovable property under him are ordered to vacate the property known as Erf [...], Kimberley, held by title deed [...], also known as [...] Constantia Avenue, Royldene, Kimberley, on or before 20 November 2018.
- In the event that Mr John-Ross Henderson and all persons occupying the immovable property under him fail to adhere to this order, the Sheriff or his Deputy for the district of Kimberley is authorised and ordered to give effect to this order in a manner deemed practical and necessary, and may obtain the assistance of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment