Barnard and Another v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Others (9952/2019) [2025] ZAGPPHC 705 (14 July 2025)

Barnard and Another v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Others (9952/2019) [2025] ZAGPPHC 705 (14 July 2025)

The court found that the agreement between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant had lapsed and was void at the time of the follow-up treatment in 2016. No valid contract governed the relationship, and the Defendant could not rely on indemnity or exclusion clauses to escape liability. The Defendant, through its Working for Water programme, controlled every aspect of the herbicide application, including the selection and deployment of the contractor and the choice of chemicals. The application of Kaput 100 Gel containing picloram was off-label, unlawful, and grossly negligent, resulting in contamination of the Plaintiffs' irrigation dams and destruction of crops. The Defendant failed to notify...

Citation
[2025] ZAGPPHC 705
Parties
Plaintiff: Barnard Petrus Johannes (Estate); Plaintiff: Röntgen Nicolaas; Defendant: Minister of Environmental Affairs; Defendant: Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; Defendant: Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 July 2025
Case Number
9952/2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Merits Judgment; Quantum Separated and Postponed Sine Die
Outcome
Defendant found liable for all damages, past and future, arising from picloram contamination on the Plaintiffs' farm due to the Working for Water programme's follow-up treatment in June/July 2016. Determination of quantum postponed sine die.
Judges
Nicholson
Legal Topics
Contamination of Property, Wrongful and Negligent Conduct, Duty of Care, Off Label Herbicide Application, Statutory Liability, Contributory Negligence
Delict Environmental Law Civil Procedure Contamination of Property Wrongful and Negligent Conduct Duty of Care Off Label Herbicide Application Statutory Liability +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 34 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barnard Petrus Johannes (Estate)

Plaintiff

Röntgen Nicolaas

Plaintiff

Minister of Environmental Affairs

Defendant

Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

Defendant

Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Merits Judgment; Quantum Separated and Postponed Sine Die

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a valid and enforceable agreement existed between the parties at the time of the follow-up treatment in 2016.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant owed the Plaintiffs a duty of care in the application of herbicides on the farm.
  3. 3 Whether the Defendant discharged its duty of care or acted wrongfully and negligently.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the agreement between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant had lapsed and was void at the time of the follow-up treatment in 2016. No valid contract governed the relationship, and the Defendant could not rely on indemnity or exclusion clauses to escape liability. The Defendant, through its Working for Water programme, controlled every aspect of the herbicide application, including the selection and deployment of the contractor and the choice of chemicals. The application of Kaput 100 Gel containing picloram was off-label, unlawful, and grossly negligent, resulting in contamination of the Plaintiffs' irrigation dams and destruction of crops. The Defendant failed to notify...

Court Disposition

Defendant found liable for all damages, past and future, arising from picloram contamination on the Plaintiffs' farm due to the Working for Water programme's follow-up treatment in June/July 2016. Determination of quantum postponed sine die.

Orders

  • Determination on quantum and merits separated in terms of Rule 33(4); quantum postponed sine die.
  • Defendant's claim against the third party postponed sine die.