Bayport Securitisation (RF) Ltd v Bambiso; Bayport Securitisation (RF) Ltd v Mantsanga; Bayport Securitisation (RF) Ltd v Zixesha (CA27/2017; CA370/2016; CA310/2016) [2020] ZAECGHC 68 (25 June 2020)
The respondents failed to establish good cause for rescission of the default judgments and did not set out any bona fide defence with prospects of success. Their affidavits contained no evidence of a triable issue, and they acquiesced in the judgments by making payments pursuant to written consents. The Magistrate erred in granting rescission orders, as the requirements for rescission were not met. The appeals are upheld, and the Magistrate's orders are set aside and replaced with orders dismissing the applications for rescission with costs.
- Citation
- [2020] ZAECGHC 68
- Parties
- Appellant: Bayport Securitisation (RF) Ltd; Respondent: Boniwe Belinda Bambiso; Respondent: Nonkululeko Mantsanga; Respondent: Zanyiwe Princess Zixesha
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2020
- Case Number
- CA27/2017; CA370/2016; CA310/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Rescission Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Magistrate's rescission orders set aside; applications for rescission dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- A Beyleveld, J Roberson
- Legal Topics
- Rescission of Judgment, Magistrates Court Act, Consent to Judgment, Bona Fide Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bayport Securitisation (RF) Ltd
Appellant
Boniwe Belinda Bambiso
Respondent
Nonkululeko Mantsanga
Respondent
Zanyiwe Princess Zixesha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court Rescission Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents established good cause for rescission of default judgments.
- 2 Whether the respondents set out a bona fide defence with prospects of success.
- 3 Whether the Magistrate erred in granting rescission orders despite written consents to judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents failed to establish good cause for rescission of the default judgments and did not set out any bona fide defence with prospects of success. Their affidavits contained no evidence of a triable issue, and they acquiesced in the judgments by making payments pursuant to written consents. The Magistrate erred in granting rescission orders, as the requirements for rescission were not met. The appeals are upheld, and the Magistrate's orders are set aside and replaced with orders dismissing the applications for rescission with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Magistrate's rescission orders set aside; applications for rescission dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with costs.
- The order of the Magistrate is set aside and replaced with: 'The application is dismissed with costs.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment