Beko Europe B.V. and Beko B.V v Whirlpool Corporation's European Major Domestic Appliances Business, and Whirlpool Maroc S.A.R.L (Morocco) and Whirlpool MEEA (UAE) (LM063Aug23) [2024] ZACT 32 (1 March 2024)

Beko Europe B.V. and Beko B.V v Whirlpool Corporation's European Major Domestic Appliances Business, and Whirlpool Maroc S.A.R.L (Morocco) and Whirlpool MEEA (UAE) (LM063Aug23) [2024] ZACT 32 (1 March 2024)

The Tribunal found that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Although the acquiring group holds high pre-merger market shares, the increment resulting from the merger is minimal (0–5%) and the parties' products are differentiated by price and positioning. The merged entity will continue to face significant competition from other manufacturers such as Samsung, LG, Hisense, and BSH. Public interest concerns were addressed through binding conditions, including a three-year moratorium on retrenchments, commitments to skills development, capital expenditure, and procurement from South African businesses. The Tribunal was satisfied that these...

Citation
[2024] ZACT 32
Parties
Applicant: Beko Europe B.V.; Applicant: Beko B.V.; Respondent: Whirlpool Corporation's European Major Domestic Appliances Business; Respondent: Whirlpool Maroc S.A.R.L (Morocco); Respondent: Whirlpool MEEA (UAE)
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
1 March 2024
Case Number
LM063Aug23
Procedural Posture
Large Merger / Conditional Approval
Outcome
Merger conditionally approved.
Judges
L Mncube, M Mazwai, AW Wessels
Legal Topics
Large Merger Review, Market Definition, Public Interest Conditions, Countervailing Power, Spread of Ownership
Competition Law Commercial and Corporate Large Merger Review Market Definition Public Interest Conditions Countervailing Power Spread of Ownership

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Beko Europe B.V.

Applicant

Beko B.V.

Applicant

Whirlpool Corporation's European Major Domestic Appliances Business

Respondent

Whirlpool Maroc S.A.R.L (Morocco)

Respondent

Whirlpool MEEA (UAE)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Large Merger / Conditional Approval

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed merger is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
  2. 2 Whether the merger raises any public interest concerns, including employment and spread of ownership.
  3. 3 Whether the merger conditions adequately address potential competition and public interest concerns.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Although the acquiring group holds high pre-merger market shares, the increment resulting from the merger is minimal (0–5%) and the parties' products are differentiated by price and positioning. The merged entity will continue to face significant competition from other manufacturers such as Samsung, LG, Hisense, and BSH. Public interest concerns were addressed through binding conditions, including a three-year moratorium on retrenchments, commitments to skills development, capital expenditure, and procurement from South African businesses. The Tribunal was satisfied that these...

Court Disposition

Merger conditionally approved.

Orders

  • The proposed merger is conditionally approved.
  • No permanent or fixed-term contract employees in South Africa may be retrenched as a result of the merger for a period of three years.