Belwana and Another v Eastern Cape MEC for Education and Another (306/16, 349/16) [2017] ZAECBHC 3; [2017] 3 All SA 32 (ECB); 2017 (6) SA 182 (ECB) (18 May 2017)
In Belwana's case, the court found that her request for information was manifestly frivolous and vexatious, as she was not shortlisted or interviewed and the information sought did not relate to her. Granting such requests would open the floodgates for similar demands from unsuccessful candidates, contrary to the purpose of PAIA. In Langeveldt's case, the court distinguished her position as she was shortlisted, interviewed, and had a legitimate grievance regarding the process. The Department's blanket refusal based on confidentiality and evaluative material was only partially upheld. The court ordered disclosure of certain records relating to Langeveldt, excluding evaluative material and...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAECBHC 3
- Parties
- Applicant: Boniwe Belwana; Applicant: Marlene Langeveldt; Respondent: Eastern Cape MEC for Education; Respondent: Eastern Cape HOD for Education
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Bhisho
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2017
- Case Number
- 306/16, 349/16
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment After Consolidated Hearing of Two PAIA Applications
- Outcome
- Belwana's application dismissed with costs; Langeveldt's application granted in part, with specified records to be furnished excluding evaluative material and confidential information.
- Judges
- I.T. Stretch
- Legal Topics
- Promotion of Access to Information Act, Grounds for Refusal of Access, Evaluative Material, Frivolous or Vexatious Requests, Internal Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Boniwe Belwana
Applicant
Marlene Langeveldt
Applicant
Eastern Cape MEC for Education
Respondent
Eastern Cape HOD for Education
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment After Consolidated Hearing of Two PAIA Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to access information held by the Department of Education regarding unsuccessful applications for posts under PAIA.
- 2 Whether the Department's refusal to provide records is justified under sections 34, 37, 44, and 45 of PAIA.
- 3 Whether the requests are manifestly frivolous or vexatious, or would unreasonably divert resources.
Ratio Decidendi
In Belwana's case, the court found that her request for information was manifestly frivolous and vexatious, as she was not shortlisted or interviewed and the information sought did not relate to her. Granting such requests would open the floodgates for similar demands from unsuccessful candidates, contrary to the purpose of PAIA. In Langeveldt's case, the court distinguished her position as she was shortlisted, interviewed, and had a legitimate grievance regarding the process. The Department's blanket refusal based on confidentiality and evaluative material was only partially upheld. The court ordered disclosure of certain records relating to Langeveldt, excluding evaluative material and...
Court Disposition
Belwana's application dismissed with costs; Langeveldt's application granted in part, with specified records to be furnished excluding evaluative material and confidential information.
Orders
- Belwana's application is dismissed with costs.
- Respondents are directed to furnish Langeveldt with the master list of candidates for the relevant post, minutes of shortlisting and recommendation meetings (excluding evaluative material about other candidates and evaluators), scores allocated to Langeveldt only, correspondence and memoranda setting out selection...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment