Benson and Another v Standard Bank of South Africa (Pty) Limited and Others (5024/2018) [2019] ZAGPJHC 30; 2019 (5) SA 152 (GJ) (21 February 2019)
The court found that the s129 notice was delivered to the appellants' chosen address, as confirmed by registered mail tracking and the absence of evidence to the contrary. Even if there was initial non-compliance, it was cured when the Standard Bank application, including the s129 notice, was served on the appellants, who received actual notice and failed to act. The requirements of the National Credit Act were satisfied before the default judgment was granted. Furthermore, the third rescission application was barred by lis pendens, as the relief sought overlapped with pending appeals on previous rescission applications. The appeal was dismissed as the appellants failed to establish...
- Citation
- [2019] ZAGPJHC 30
- Parties
- Appellant: Benson, JM; Appellant: Benson, GV; Respondent: Standard Bank of South Africa (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Sherriff of Johannesburg West; Respondent: H.M Botha Registrar of Deeds: Johannesburg; Respondent: Gert Cornelius
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2019
- Case Number
- 5024/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Third Rescission Application
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Unterhalter, Makhanya, Tsoka
- Legal Topics
- Rescission of Judgment, National Credit Act Compliance, Service of Process, Lis Pendens
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benson, JM
Appellant
Benson, GV
Appellant
Standard Bank of South Africa (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Sherriff of Johannesburg West
Respondent
H.M Botha Registrar of Deeds: Johannesburg
Respondent
Gert Cornelius
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Third Rescission Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the s129 notice under the National Credit Act was properly delivered to the appellants before the default judgment was obtained.
- 2 Whether the failure to deliver the s129 notice rendered the default judgment a nullity and justified rescission.
- 3 Whether the third rescission application was barred by lis pendens due to pending appeals on previous rescission applications.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the s129 notice was delivered to the appellants' chosen address, as confirmed by registered mail tracking and the absence of evidence to the contrary. Even if there was initial non-compliance, it was cured when the Standard Bank application, including the s129 notice, was served on the appellants, who received actual notice and failed to act. The requirements of the National Credit Act were satisfied before the default judgment was granted. Furthermore, the third rescission application was barred by lis pendens, as the relief sought overlapped with pending appeals on previous rescission applications. The appeal was dismissed as the appellants failed to establish...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment