Bert's Bricks (Pty) Ltd and Another v Inspector of Mines, North West Region and Others (15347/2011) [2012] ZAGPPHC 11 (9 February 2012)
The court found that the second applicant's brick making operations do not fall within the definition of a 'mine' under the Mine Health and Safety Act. The brick yard is not a borehole, excavation, or place where a mineral deposit is exploited, nor is it a 'works' as defined in the Act. Even applying the extended meaning of 'mining area' from the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, the brick yard is not covered, as no mining right or permit applies to that area. The inspectors' actions in issuing the section 54(1) notice were not supported by objective facts indicating any risk to health or safety, and their instructions were disproportionate and not properly considered. The...
- Citation
- [2012] ZAGPPHC 11
- Parties
- Applicant: Bert's Bricks (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Explo-Clay (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Inspector of Mines, North West Region; Respondent: Principal Inspector of Mines, North West Region; Respondent: Chief Inspector of Mines; Respondent: Director-General, Department of Mineral Resources; Respondent: Minister of Mineral Resources
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 February 2012
- Case Number
- 15347/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Unopposed Motion Court; Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; declaratory relief issued in favour of the applicants.
- Judges
- Southwood
- Legal Topics
- Mine Health and Safety Act, Jurisdiction of Inspectors, Declaratory Relief, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bert's Bricks (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Explo-Clay (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Inspector of Mines, North West Region
Respondent
Principal Inspector of Mines, North West Region
Respondent
Chief Inspector of Mines
Respondent
Director-General, Department of Mineral Resources
Respondent
Minister of Mineral Resources
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Unopposed Motion Court; Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Mine Health and Safety Act 29 of 1996 applies to the second applicant's brick making activities and operations on Portion 100 of the Farm Harpington 461 IQ, North West Province.
- 2 Whether the respondents' actions in issuing a section 54(1) notice were lawful and justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the second applicant's brick making operations do not fall within the definition of a 'mine' under the Mine Health and Safety Act. The brick yard is not a borehole, excavation, or place where a mineral deposit is exploited, nor is it a 'works' as defined in the Act. Even applying the extended meaning of 'mining area' from the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, the brick yard is not covered, as no mining right or permit applies to that area. The inspectors' actions in issuing the section 54(1) notice were not supported by objective facts indicating any risk to health or safety, and their instructions were disproportionate and not properly considered. The...
Court Disposition
Application granted; declaratory relief issued in favour of the applicants.
Orders
- It is declared that the provisions of the Mine Health and Safety Act 29 of 1996 do not apply to the second applicant's brick making activities and operations conducted on Portion 100 (a Portion of Portion 98) of the Farm Harpington 461 IQ, North West Province.
- The respondents, jointly and severally, are ordered to pay the costs of this application, including the wasted costs of 8 December 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment