BG Bojosinyane and Associates v Van Staden (CA&R77/2015) [2017] ZANCHC 67 (26 May 2017)

BG Bojosinyane and Associates v Van Staden (CA&R77/2015) [2017] ZANCHC 67 (26 May 2017)

The appeal was upheld because the sheriff failed to lawfully attach the trailer in accordance with the Magistrates' Court Rules and did not have a valid instruction from the appellant to store the trailer. The sheriff's reliance on section 71A of the Magistrates' Court Act was misplaced, as the trailer was never attached nor unclaimed in the sense required by the statute. There was no express or implied agreement making the appellant liable for storage costs, and no professional practice or trade usage was established to support such liability. The escalation of storage fees was arbitrary and unjustified, and the Magistrate misdirected himself in finding for the sheriff. The law...

Citation
[2017] ZANCHC 67
Parties
Appellant: BG Bojosinyane & Associates; Respondent: Sheriff: JH Van Staden
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 May 2017
Case Number
CA&R77/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Full Bench Appeal From Magistrate's Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal upheld; Magistrate's judgment and order set aside.
Judges
Kgomo, Williams, Mamosebo
Legal Topics
Magistrates Court Rules, Warrant of Execution, Storage Costs, Attorney Liability, Judicial Attachment
Civil Procedure Land and Property Magistrates Court Rules Warrant of Execution Storage Costs Attorney Liability Judicial Attachment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BG Bojosinyane & Associates

Appellant

Sheriff: JH Van Staden

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Full Bench Appeal From Magistrate's Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant, as instructing attorney, can be held liable to the sheriff for storage costs incurred in respect of a trailer delivered by the judgment creditor.
  2. 2 Whether the sheriff lawfully attached the trailer and complied with the Magistrates' Court Rules.
  3. 3 Whether the sheriff was entitled to sell the trailer under section 71A of the Magistrates' Court Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was upheld because the sheriff failed to lawfully attach the trailer in accordance with the Magistrates' Court Rules and did not have a valid instruction from the appellant to store the trailer. The sheriff's reliance on section 71A of the Magistrates' Court Act was misplaced, as the trailer was never attached nor unclaimed in the sense required by the statute. There was no express or implied agreement making the appellant liable for storage costs, and no professional practice or trade usage was established to support such liability. The escalation of storage fees was arbitrary and unjustified, and the Magistrate misdirected himself in finding for the sheriff. The law...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; Magistrate's judgment and order set aside.

Orders

  • The appeal is upheld.
  • The Magistrate's judgment and order are set aside.