Bhe and Others v Magistrate, Khayelitsha and Others (9489/02) [2003] ZAWCHC 49; 2004 (1) BCLR 27 (C); 2004 (2) SA 544 (C) (25 September 2003)
The court held that the principle of primogeniture, as applied under African Customary Law and enforced by the Black Administration Act and its regulations, constitutes unfair discrimination on the grounds of race and gender, violating section 9 of the Constitution. The exclusion of female descendants from intestate succession cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny. The relevant provisions of the Black Administration Act, its regulations, and section 1(4)(b) of the Intestate Succession Act are declared unconstitutional and invalid to the extent that they exclude female and Black descendants from inheritance. Until the legislature corrects these defects, the distribution of intestate...
- Citation
- [2003] ZAWCHC 49
- Parties
- Applicant: Nonkululeko Letta Bhe; Applicant: Anelisa Bhe; Applicant: Nontupheko Maretha Bhe; Applicant: The Women’s Legal Centre Trust; Respondent: The Magistrate, Khayelitsha; Respondent: Maboyisi Nelson Mgolombane; Respondent: The President of RSA; Respondent: The Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2003
- Case Number
- 9489/02
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- The application is granted. The relevant statutory and regulatory provisions are declared unconstitutional and invalid. The first and second applicants are declared the sole heirs to the deceased's estate.
- Judges
- Ngwenya, Hlophe JP
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Gender Discrimination, Primogeniture, Customary Law Development, Equality Clause, Invalidity of Statute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nonkululeko Letta Bhe
Applicant
Anelisa Bhe
Applicant
Nontupheko Maretha Bhe
Applicant
The Women’s Legal Centre Trust
Applicant
The Magistrate, Khayelitsha
Respondent
Maboyisi Nelson Mgolombane
Respondent
The President of RSA
Respondent
The Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the principle of primogeniture in African Customary Law, which excludes female descendants from intestate succession, is unconstitutional.
- 2 Whether the relevant provisions of the Black Administration Act and its regulations, as well as the Intestate Succession Act, unlawfully discriminate on the basis of race and gender.
- 3 Whether the first and second applicants, as female children of the deceased, are entitled to inherit ab intestato from their father's estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the principle of primogeniture, as applied under African Customary Law and enforced by the Black Administration Act and its regulations, constitutes unfair discrimination on the grounds of race and gender, violating section 9 of the Constitution. The exclusion of female descendants from intestate succession cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny. The relevant provisions of the Black Administration Act, its regulations, and section 1(4)(b) of the Intestate Succession Act are declared unconstitutional and invalid to the extent that they exclude female and Black descendants from inheritance. Until the legislature corrects these defects, the distribution of intestate...
Court Disposition
The application is granted. The relevant statutory and regulatory provisions are declared unconstitutional and invalid. The first and second applicants are declared the sole heirs to the deceased's estate.
Orders
- It is declared that sections 23(10)(a), (c), and (e) of the Black Administration Act are unconstitutional and invalid.
- Regulation 2(e) of the Regulations for the Administration and Distribution of Estates of Deceased Blacks, published under Government Gazette No 10601 dated 7 February 1987, is declared invalid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment