Biggs and Another v Cousins and Others (3323/2013) [2014] ZAECPEHC 104 (15 July 2014)
The court held that the applicants failed to demonstrate that the evidence they sought to introduce was material to the main application or that their failure to adduce it earlier was not due to a lack of reasonable diligence. The evidence related to matters already settled by agreement and made an order of court, and its introduction would amount to a new cause of action, which is impermissible at this stage. The court emphasized the need for finality in judicial proceedings and found that the applicants' conduct amounted to an abuse of process. Accordingly, the application to file further affidavits and to amend the papers was dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- [2014] ZAECPEHC 104
- Parties
- Applicant: Anthony Lauriston Biggs; Applicant: Ridge Farm CC; Respondent: Allan Cousins; Respondent: Gerald Whitehead; Respondent: Gysbert Jacobus van Deventer; Respondent: Addo Afrique Safari Lodge CC; Respondent: Addo Afrique Estate (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2014
- Case Number
- 3323/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Interlocutory Application for Leave to File Further Affidavits and Amend Papers Before Judgment in Main Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs, including costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel where necessary.
- Judges
- P.W. Tshiki
- Legal Topics
- Filing of Further Affidavits, Amendment of Pleadings, Arbitration Act Section 33, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Lauriston Biggs
Applicant
Ridge Farm CC
Applicant
Allan Cousins
Respondent
Gerald Whitehead
Respondent
Gysbert Jacobus van Deventer
Respondent
Addo Afrique Safari Lodge CC
Respondent
Addo Afrique Estate (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Interlocutory Application for Leave to File Further Affidavits and Amend Papers Before Judgment in Main Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file further affidavits after judgment was reserved in the main application.
- 2 Whether the applicants should be permitted to amend their papers in the main application.
- 3 Whether the evidence sought to be introduced is material and not an abuse of process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicants failed to demonstrate that the evidence they sought to introduce was material to the main application or that their failure to adduce it earlier was not due to a lack of reasonable diligence. The evidence related to matters already settled by agreement and made an order of court, and its introduction would amount to a new cause of action, which is impermissible at this stage. The court emphasized the need for finality in judicial proceedings and found that the applicants' conduct amounted to an abuse of process. Accordingly, the application to file further affidavits and to amend the papers was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs, including costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel where necessary.
Orders
- The application by applicants to file further evidence and to amend is dismissed with costs, including costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel where necessary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment