Bisonbord Ltd. v K Braun Woodworking Machinery (Pty) Ltd. (384/88) [1990] ZASCA 86; 1991 (1) SA 482 (AD); [1991] 1 All SA 201 (A) (10 September 1990)

Bisonbord Ltd. v K Braun Woodworking Machinery (Pty) Ltd. (384/88) [1990] ZASCA 86; 1991 (1) SA 482 (AD); [1991] 1 All SA 201 (A) (10 September 1990)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a South African domestic company resides, for jurisdictional purposes, at the place of its registered office. If the principal place of business is elsewhere, the company may also reside there, resulting in dual residence. The court endorsed the reasoning in Dairy Board v John T Rennie & Co (Pty) Ltd, finding that the registered office provides a certain and ascertainable forum for claims against companies, which is consistent with commercial convenience and statutory requirements. The court further held that the doctrine of effectiveness is satisfied, as the court of the registered office has jurisdiction to grant winding up orders and enforce...

Citation
[1990] ZASCA 86
Parties
Appellant: Bisonbord Limited; Respondent: K Braun Woodworking Machinery (Proprietary) Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 September 1990
Case Number
384/88
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Witwatersrand Local Division; Challenge to Special Plea on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Appeal upheld. Special plea to jurisdiction dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Judges
Hoexter, Botha, Milne, Nicholas, Goldstone
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction Over Companies, Registered Office as Residence, Principal Place of Business, Doctrine of Effectiveness, Dual Residence, Forum Domicilii
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Jurisdiction Over Companies Registered Office as Residence Principal Place of Business Doctrine of Effectiveness Dual Residence Forum Domicilii

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 28 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bisonbord Limited

Appellant

K Braun Woodworking Machinery (Proprietary) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Witwatersrand Local Division; Challenge to Special Plea on Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Is a South African court competent to hear a monetary claim against a company solely because its registered office is within the court's jurisdiction?
  2. 2 Does a company's registered office constitute its legal residence for jurisdictional purposes, or is the principal place of business determinative?
  3. 3 Can a company have dual residence for jurisdictional purposes under South African law?

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a South African domestic company resides, for jurisdictional purposes, at the place of its registered office. If the principal place of business is elsewhere, the company may also reside there, resulting in dual residence. The court endorsed the reasoning in Dairy Board v John T Rennie & Co (Pty) Ltd, finding that the registered office provides a certain and ascertainable forum for claims against companies, which is consistent with commercial convenience and statutory requirements. The court further held that the doctrine of effectiveness is satisfied, as the court of the registered office has jurisdiction to grant winding up orders and enforce...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld. Special plea to jurisdiction dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.

Orders

  • The first defendant's special plea raising an objection to the jurisdiction of the Court is dismissed with costs.
  • The order of absolution from the instance with costs made by the Court a quo is set aside.