Blackbeard v Round Square Property Developments (Pty) Ltd and Others (56840/2009) [2010] ZAGPPHC 544 (19 February 2010)

Blackbeard v Round Square Property Developments (Pty) Ltd and Others (56840/2009) [2010] ZAGPPHC 544 (19 February 2010)

The court found that the applicant was the lender under the loan agreement and that the first respondent was the principal debtor. The suretyship agreement referenced Finspire Capital (Pty) Ltd as creditor, creating a discrepancy with the principal agreement. The applicant elected not to pursue rectification, and in the absence of such, the suretyship could not be enforced against the respondents except where liability arose under the mortgage bond. The Taute Family Trust was not held liable due to lack of evidence of authority and power to bind itself as surety. The fifth and sixth respondents were held liable under the mortgage bond. The court granted judgment for the principal amount,...

Citation
[2010] ZAGPPHC 544
Parties
Applicant: Anthony James Blackbeard; Respondent: Round Square Property Developments (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Access Valet and Car Wash CC; Respondent: Taute Michael NO; Respondent: Taute Allinda Salome NO; Respondent: Janse van Rensburg Gerhardus Johannes; Respondent: Janse van Rensburg Allinda Salome; Respondent: Taute Michael
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 February 2010
Case Number
56840/2009
Procedural Posture
Money Judgment Application / Judgment on Motion
Outcome
Judgment granted in favour of the applicant against the first, fifth, and sixth respondents for the principal amount, interest, and costs. Relief against the Taute Family Trust and other respondents denied.
Judges
Sapire
Legal Topics
Suretyship Liability, Loan Agreement, Mortgage Bond Enforcement, Conventional Penalties Act, Rectification of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony James Blackbeard

Applicant

Round Square Property Developments (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Access Valet and Car Wash CC

Respondent

Taute Michael NO

Respondent

Taute Allinda Salome NO

Respondent

Janse van Rensburg Gerhardus Johannes

Respondent

Janse van Rensburg Allinda Salome

Respondent

Taute Michael

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Money Judgment Application / Judgment on Motion

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment against the respondents for the amount claimed under the loan agreement.
  2. 2 Whether the suretyship agreement binds the respondents as sureties for the principal debtor.
  3. 3 Whether the mortgage bond secures the applicant's claim against certain respondents.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was the lender under the loan agreement and that the first respondent was the principal debtor. The suretyship agreement referenced Finspire Capital (Pty) Ltd as creditor, creating a discrepancy with the principal agreement. The applicant elected not to pursue rectification, and in the absence of such, the suretyship could not be enforced against the respondents except where liability arose under the mortgage bond. The Taute Family Trust was not held liable due to lack of evidence of authority and power to bind itself as surety. The fifth and sixth respondents were held liable under the mortgage bond. The court granted judgment for the principal amount,...

Court Disposition

Judgment granted in favour of the applicant against the first, fifth, and sixth respondents for the principal amount, interest, and costs. Relief against the Taute Family Trust and other respondents denied.

Orders

  • Payment of the sum of R573,125.40 by the first, fifth, and sixth respondents, jointly and severally, the one to pay the others to be absolved.
  • Interest on the said amount calculated at the rate of 7.5% per month from 15 September 2009 to date of payment.