Blackhill Engineering & Construction CC v Baolong Boora Tshidi Tribal Authority and Others (385/2009) [2012] ZANWHC 21 (31 May 2012)
The court found that the resolutions granting mining rights were invalid because they were not preceded by meetings of the Lekoko ward or village, nor was there evidence of proper community consultation or participation as required by the Interim Protection of Informal Land Rights Act. The exclusion of female members from voting further rendered the process non-compliant with statutory and constitutional requirements. The resolutions were passed at council meetings of the Tribal Authority, but this did not satisfy the legal requirement for community consent. Consequently, the related letter to the Department of Minerals and Energy and the shareholders agreement were also invalid. The...
- Citation
- [2012] ZANWHC 21
- Parties
- Applicant: Blackhill Engineering & Construction CC; Respondent: Barolong Boora Tshidi Tribal Authority; Respondent: Lekoko North Mine (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Lekoko South Mine (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2012
- Case Number
- 385/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Final Judgment After Referral to Oral Evidence
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; counter application granted; resolutions and related correspondence declared invalid; no order as to costs except for wasted costs on 22 March 2012 awarded against first respondent on attorney and client scale.
- Judges
- A A Landman
- Legal Topics
- Informal Land Rights, Tribal Resolutions, Customary Law Procedure, Mineral Rights, Interim Protection of Informal Land Rights Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Blackhill Engineering & Construction CC
Applicant
Barolong Boora Tshidi Tribal Authority
Respondent
Lekoko North Mine (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Lekoko South Mine (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Final Judgment After Referral to Oral Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the resolutions granting mining rights complied with the requirements of the Interim Protection of Informal Land Rights Act and tribal custom.
- 2 Whether the resolutions were valid and binding on the community.
- 3 Whether the exclusion of female members from voting invalidated the resolutions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the resolutions granting mining rights were invalid because they were not preceded by meetings of the Lekoko ward or village, nor was there evidence of proper community consultation or participation as required by the Interim Protection of Informal Land Rights Act. The exclusion of female members from voting further rendered the process non-compliant with statutory and constitutional requirements. The resolutions were passed at council meetings of the Tribal Authority, but this did not satisfy the legal requirement for community consent. Consequently, the related letter to the Department of Minerals and Energy and the shareholders agreement were also invalid. The...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; counter application granted; resolutions and related correspondence declared invalid; no order as to costs except for wasted costs on 22 March 2012 awarded against first respondent on attorney and client scale.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- There will be no order for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment