Blackie Swart Argitekte v Van Heerden (411/1983) [1985] ZASCA 107; [1986] 1 All SA 373 (A) (27 September 1985)

Blackie Swart Argitekte v Van Heerden (411/1983) [1985] ZASCA 107; [1986] 1 All SA 373 (A) (27 September 1985)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the payment of R5,040 by the respondent, although accompanied by a condition of full and final settlement, did not extinguish the appellant's claim for the full amount. The secretary who accepted the payment lacked authority to settle the dispute, and the principal (appellant)...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1985] ZASCA 107
Parties
Appellant: Blackie Swart Argitekte; Respondent: Gustav E. van Heerden
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
27 September 1985
Case Number
411/1983
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Transvaal Provincial Division
Outcome
Appeal upheld. Judgment granted in favour of the appellant for the full amount claimed, with interest and costs.
Judges
Kotzé, Botha, Van Heerden, Hefer, Boshoff
Legal Topics
Professional Services Contract, Settlement and Estoppel, Mandate and Authority, Payment in Full and Final Settlement
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Professional Services Contract Settlement and Estoppel Mandate and Authority Payment in Full and Final Settlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Blackie Swart Argitekte

Appellant

Gustav E. van Heerden

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Transvaal Provincial Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the payment of R5,040 by the respondent constituted full and final settlement of the appellant's claim for professional services.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's agent (secretary) was authorised to accept payment in full and final settlement.
  3. 3 Whether the appellant was entitled to claim the full amount for services rendered despite the earlier payment and settlement attempt.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the payment of R5,040 by the respondent, although accompanied by a condition of full and final settlement, did not extinguish the appellant's claim for the full amount. The secretary who accepted the payment lacked authority to settle the dispute, and the principal (appellant) had expressly instructed its attorney to pursue the full claim. The respondent's reliance on estoppel failed due to the absence of necessary factual and legal foundation. The evidence established that the appellant had performed its contractual obligations by preparing the working drawings as instructed, and there was no agreement to limit the building cost to R420,000. The...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld. Judgment granted in favour of the appellant for the full amount claimed, with interest and costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is upheld with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
  • The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with: Judgment is granted in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant for payment of R19,026.15; interest on the said amount at 11% per annum from 26 January 1981 to date of payment; and costs of suit, including the costs of two counsel.