Bodibe v Public Service Co-ordinating Bargaining Council and Others (JR490/15) [2018] ZALCJHB 124 (23 March 2018)
The arbitrator's jurisdictional ruling was objectively wrong. He relied on the Ministerial Memorandum without properly admitting it into evidence and failed to allow oral evidence to resolve factual disputes regarding the employment relationship and communication of the appeal outcome. The arbitrator also failed to comply with the prior Labour Court judgment, which had set aside an earlier award for exceeding powers and directed a hearing de novo. The arbitrator was obliged to ascertain the real dispute and was not bound by the parties' characterisation. The PSCBC had jurisdiction to determine the dispute, and the matter should be remitted for fresh arbitration before a different...
- Citation
- [2018] ZALCJHB 124
- Parties
- Applicant: Elizabeth Matlakala Bodibe; Respondent: Public Service Co-ordinating Bargaining Council; Respondent: Daniel Kgomotje Matji N.O.; Respondent: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2018
- Case Number
- JR490/15
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Arbitration award set aside; matter remitted for fresh arbitration before a different commissioner; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Mahosi
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Bargaining Council, Collective Agreement Interpretation, Employment Relationship, Review of Arbitration Award, Disciplinary Procedure, Remittal for Fresh Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elizabeth Matlakala Bodibe
Applicant
Public Service Co-ordinating Bargaining Council
Respondent
Daniel Kgomotje Matji N.O.
Respondent
Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator's jurisdictional ruling was objectively wrong.
- 2 Whether the applicant was an employee at the time the dispute arose.
- 3 Whether the PSCBC had jurisdiction to entertain the dispute.
Ratio Decidendi
The arbitrator's jurisdictional ruling was objectively wrong. He relied on the Ministerial Memorandum without properly admitting it into evidence and failed to allow oral evidence to resolve factual disputes regarding the employment relationship and communication of the appeal outcome. The arbitrator also failed to comply with the prior Labour Court judgment, which had set aside an earlier award for exceeding powers and directed a hearing de novo. The arbitrator was obliged to ascertain the real dispute and was not bound by the parties' characterisation. The PSCBC had jurisdiction to determine the dispute, and the matter should be remitted for fresh arbitration before a different...
Court Disposition
Arbitration award set aside; matter remitted for fresh arbitration before a different commissioner; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The arbitration award issued by the second respondent dated 12 March 2015 under case reference number PSCB 166-12/13 is reviewed and set aside.
- The first respondent is directed to set down the dispute for arbitration before a commissioner other than the second respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment