Bodies Under Construction CC and Others v Permasolve Investments (Pty) Ltd (19457/2023) [2023] ZAWCHC 326 (20 December 2023)
The court found that the applicants had a historic and substantial connection to the alternative power supply, which was critical to their use of the leased premises as a gym. The right to use the generator was not merely personal but was closely connected to their possession of the premises, given its necessity for business continuity during load shedding. The respondent's unilateral disconnection, despite ongoing arbitration discussions, amounted to unlawful deprivation of quasi-possession and constituted spoliation. The applicants satisfied both requirements for the remedy: peaceful possession and unlawful deprivation. The court ordered immediate reconnection to restore the status quo...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAWCHC 326
- Parties
- Applicant: Bodies Under Construction CC; Applicant: Specialised Weight Endurance and Aerobic Training CC; Applicant: Fluidity Wellness CC; Respondent: Permasolve Investments (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2023
- Case Number
- 19457/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Relief and Reasons for Order
- Outcome
- Interim relief granted; respondent ordered to immediately reconnect applicants to the alternative power supply pending arbitration. Costs awarded against respondent.
- Judges
- Wille
- Legal Topics
- Spoliation, Quasi Possession, Lease Dispute, Alternative Power Supply, Urgent Interdict
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bodies Under Construction CC
Applicant
Specialised Weight Endurance and Aerobic Training CC
Applicant
Fluidity Wellness CC
Applicant
Permasolve Investments (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Relief and Reasons for Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants were unlawfully deprived of their quasi-possession of the alternative power supply at the leased premises.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to a spoliation remedy and reconnection to the alternative power supply.
- 3 Whether the right to use the alternative power supply is sufficiently connected to possession of the premises to warrant protection under spoliation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had a historic and substantial connection to the alternative power supply, which was critical to their use of the leased premises as a gym. The right to use the generator was not merely personal but was closely connected to their possession of the premises, given its necessity for business continuity during load shedding. The respondent's unilateral disconnection, despite ongoing arbitration discussions, amounted to unlawful deprivation of quasi-possession and constituted spoliation. The applicants satisfied both requirements for the remedy: peaceful possession and unlawful deprivation. The court ordered immediate reconnection to restore the status quo...
Court Disposition
Interim relief granted; respondent ordered to immediately reconnect applicants to the alternative power supply pending arbitration. Costs awarded against respondent.
Orders
- The respondent is directed to immediately reconnect the premises occupied by the applicants to the alternative power supply so that the applicants may continue occupation thereof.
- If the respondent fails to comply, the sheriff is authorised to reconnect the premises to the alternative electricity supply installed at the property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment