Body Corporate of Simmer Court v Masilela and Another (06945/2013) [2014] ZAGPJHC 10 (10 February 2014)

Body Corporate of Simmer Court v Masilela and Another (06945/2013) [2014] ZAGPJHC 10 (10 February 2014)

The court found that the arbitration award issued on 29 September 2012 is valid, binding, and has not been set aside or suspended. The applicant satisfied the requirements under section 31(1) of the Arbitration Act. The respondents failed to provide any substantive grounds for opposing the enforcement of the award....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] ZAGPJHC 10
Parties
Applicant: Body Corporate of Simmer Court (SS22/2006); Respondent: Malesela Joe Masilela; Respondent: Thandiswa Magdeline Masilela
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
06945/2013
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application to Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court
Outcome
Application granted. Arbitration award made an order of court.
Judges
Francis
Legal Topics
Arbitration Award Enforcement, Arbitration Act Section 31, Order of Court
Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Arbitration Award Enforcement Arbitration Act Section 31 Order of Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Body Corporate of Simmer Court (SS22/2006)

Applicant

Malesela Joe Masilela

Respondent

Thandiswa Magdeline Masilela

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application to Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the arbitration award issued on 29 September 2012 should be made an order of court under section 31(1) of the Arbitration Act.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents have grounds to oppose the enforcement of the arbitration award.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the arbitration award issued on 29 September 2012 is valid, binding, and has not been set aside or suspended. The applicant satisfied the requirements under section 31(1) of the Arbitration Act. The respondents failed to provide any substantive grounds for opposing the enforcement of the award. Accordingly, the court granted the application and made the arbitration award an order of court.

Court Disposition

Application granted. Arbitration award made an order of court.

Orders

  • The arbitration award issued on 29 September 2012 is made an order of court.
  • The respondents are ordered to comply with the terms of the arbitration award.