BOE Bank Ltd v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (240/2003) [2005] ZASCA 21; 2005 (4) SA 336 (SCA) (29 March 2005)
Section 118(3) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 creates a statutory charge over property for all municipal debts, regardless of when they became due, and this charge enjoys preference over any mortgage bond registered against the property, including those registered prior to the commencement of the Act. The time limit in section 118(1) applies only to the embargo on transfer and does not limit the scope of the statutory charge in section 118(3). Applying section 118(3) to existing mortgage bonds does not amount to retrospective effect, as the extended security operates only from the date of commencement of the Act and does not purport to alter the law prior to...
- Citation
- [2005] ZASCA 21
- Parties
- Appellant: BOE Bank Limited; Respondent: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2005
- Case Number
- 240/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Scott, Mthiyane, Brand, Conradie, Ponnan
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Charges, Statutory Hypothec, Interpretation of Statutes, Retrospectivity, Mortgage Priority
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BOE Bank Limited
Appellant
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the charge upon property created by section 118(3) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 include debts older than two years?
- 2 Does the preference under section 118(3) apply to mortgage bonds registered prior to the commencement of the Act?
- 3 Does applying section 118(3) to existing bonds amount to retrospective effect?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 118(3) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 creates a statutory charge over property for all municipal debts, regardless of when they became due, and this charge enjoys preference over any mortgage bond registered against the property, including those registered prior to the commencement of the Act. The time limit in section 118(1) applies only to the embargo on transfer and does not limit the scope of the statutory charge in section 118(3). Applying section 118(3) to existing mortgage bonds does not amount to retrospective effect, as the extended security operates only from the date of commencement of the Act and does not purport to alter the law prior to...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
- The order of the court a quo confirming the municipality's interpretation of section 118(3) is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment