Boikanyo v MFC, a division of NEDBANK Ltd (NCT/138823/2019/141(1)) [2021] ZANCT 22 (7 July 2021)
The Tribunal found that the applicant raised issues regarding the use of unsubstantiated business income in the affordability assessment and the requirements under the National Credit Act for financial statements. These issues warrant consideration in a hearing on the merits. The Tribunal, exercising its discretion under section 141(1), determined that leave to refer should be granted, as the applicant has raised arguable points that may have reasonable prospects of success if substantiated. The Tribunal emphasized that there is no formal test for granting leave and that the matter should be considered in the context of the circumstances presented.
- Citation
- [2021] ZANCT 22
- Parties
- Applicant: Itumeleng Frans Boikanyo; Respondent: MFC, a division of Nedbank Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 July 2021
- Case Number
- NCT/138823/2019/141(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Refer Under Section 141(1) of the National Credit Act
- Outcome
- Leave to refer the matter directly to the Tribunal is granted.
- Judges
- J Simpson, M Peenze, B Dumisa
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Leave to Refer, Affordability Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Itumeleng Frans Boikanyo
Applicant
MFC, a division of Nedbank Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Refer Under Section 141(1) of the National Credit Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has reasonable prospects of success in a claim of reckless lending against MFC.
- 2 Whether MFC was permitted to use the applicant's declared business income without requiring financial statements.
- 3 Whether leave to refer the matter directly to the Tribunal should be granted under section 141(1) of the National Credit Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the applicant raised issues regarding the use of unsubstantiated business income in the affordability assessment and the requirements under the National Credit Act for financial statements. These issues warrant consideration in a hearing on the merits. The Tribunal, exercising its discretion under section 141(1), determined that leave to refer should be granted, as the applicant has raised arguable points that may have reasonable prospects of success if substantiated. The Tribunal emphasized that there is no formal test for granting leave and that the matter should be considered in the context of the circumstances presented.
Court Disposition
Leave to refer the matter directly to the Tribunal is granted.
Orders
- The applicant's application for leave to refer the matter directly to the Tribunal is granted.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment