Botha and Another v Hendriks N.O and Others (700/2008) [2008] ZANCHC 25 (6 June 2008)
The court held that the noting of an appeal, even if late and subject to condonation, automatically suspends execution of the Magistrate's Court judgment under common law. The first applicant complied with the procedural requirements for noting an appeal by delivering the notice and furnishing security. The distinction between condonation and due noting of appeal was emphasized; condonation is for the appeal court, while due noting is a procedural matter in the Magistrate's Court. The court found that the first applicant's right to possession, derived from the deed of sale, was exercised through the second applicant, a close corporation of which she is the sole member. The respondents'...
- Citation
- [2008] ZANCHC 25
- Parties
- Applicant: Lorraine Sophie Botha; Applicant: Khulelekani Laundry CC; Respondent: Johannes Jacobus Wiese Hendriks NO; Respondent: Martha Magrieta Hendriks NO; Respondent: Henry Robins Rich NO; Respondent: Cyril Strydom; Respondent: Johan Hendriks; Respondent: The Sheriff
- Court
- Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 June 2008
- Case Number
- 700/2008
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Interim Interdict Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted. Interim interdict issued pending appeal.
- Judges
- Majiedt
- Legal Topics
- Interdict Pendente Lite, Suspension of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Possession and Occupation, Locus Standi
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lorraine Sophie Botha
Applicant
Khulelekani Laundry CC
Applicant
Johannes Jacobus Wiese Hendriks NO
Respondent
Martha Magrieta Hendriks NO
Respondent
Henry Robins Rich NO
Respondent
Cyril Strydom
Respondent
Johan Hendriks
Respondent
The Sheriff
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Interim Interdict Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the execution of the Magistrate's Court judgment is automatically suspended upon the noting of an appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to restoration of possession and occupation of the property and equipment pending appeal.
- 3 Whether the second applicant has locus standi to seek relief despite not being a party to the Magistrate's Court proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the noting of an appeal, even if late and subject to condonation, automatically suspends execution of the Magistrate's Court judgment under common law. The first applicant complied with the procedural requirements for noting an appeal by delivering the notice and furnishing security. The distinction between condonation and due noting of appeal was emphasized; condonation is for the appeal court, while due noting is a procedural matter in the Magistrate's Court. The court found that the first applicant's right to possession, derived from the deed of sale, was exercised through the second applicant, a close corporation of which she is the sole member. The respondents'...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Interim interdict issued pending appeal.
Orders
- The first, second and third respondents are interdicted from denying the applicants access to erf 4128 for purposes of trading on the premises as a laundry service provider pending the outcome and finalisation of the appeal under case number CA&R 37/08.
- The Sheriff of the Magistrate's Court, De Aar, is ordered to release the machinery and tools of trade attached in terms of annexure A to the founding affidavit for purposes of trade only, pending the outcome and finalisation of the appeal under case number CA&R 37/08, subject to the goods remaining under judicial...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment